教育诚信调查:一项衡量教育部门诚信的建议

Z. Nasution, Sari Angraeni, Aida Zulaiha, Hani Mairina Matan, Pipin Purbowati, Siti Patimah, Grady Nagara
{"title":"教育诚信调查:一项衡量教育部门诚信的建议","authors":"Z. Nasution, Sari Angraeni, Aida Zulaiha, Hani Mairina Matan, Pipin Purbowati, Siti Patimah, Grady Nagara","doi":"10.32697/integritas.v8i2.954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrity as a concept is usually associated with and measured by one of two separate scopes: personal or organizational. This paper argues that in educational institutions such as schools or universities, integrity measurement should not be done by separating personal and organizational concepts. In addition, integrity in education sector is often discussed just from academic perspective such as cheating, plagiarism or other wrongdoings in classroom or research activity. The measurement concept in this paper also includes non-academic aspects such as administrative services, financial management, and procurement. Educational integrity in this paper combines three concepts which are the character dimension (Istiani, 2015), the Corporate Ethical Value model (Kaptein, 2007), and the classification of corrupt behaviors in education compiled by KPK from various resources (2018). To conclude, the concept of educational integrity should be looked as holistic one which can be assessed from the integrity character of students, the ecosystem that influences them, and also the compliance level of school’s governance. This offered concept tries to fulfill the strategic role in encouraging educational stakeholders to massively and systematically evaluate the achievement of integrity improvement in the education sector, including the human capital result.","PeriodicalId":336909,"journal":{"name":"Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education integrity survey: A suggested measurement of integrity in education sector\",\"authors\":\"Z. Nasution, Sari Angraeni, Aida Zulaiha, Hani Mairina Matan, Pipin Purbowati, Siti Patimah, Grady Nagara\",\"doi\":\"10.32697/integritas.v8i2.954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Integrity as a concept is usually associated with and measured by one of two separate scopes: personal or organizational. This paper argues that in educational institutions such as schools or universities, integrity measurement should not be done by separating personal and organizational concepts. In addition, integrity in education sector is often discussed just from academic perspective such as cheating, plagiarism or other wrongdoings in classroom or research activity. The measurement concept in this paper also includes non-academic aspects such as administrative services, financial management, and procurement. Educational integrity in this paper combines three concepts which are the character dimension (Istiani, 2015), the Corporate Ethical Value model (Kaptein, 2007), and the classification of corrupt behaviors in education compiled by KPK from various resources (2018). To conclude, the concept of educational integrity should be looked as holistic one which can be assessed from the integrity character of students, the ecosystem that influences them, and also the compliance level of school’s governance. This offered concept tries to fulfill the strategic role in encouraging educational stakeholders to massively and systematically evaluate the achievement of integrity improvement in the education sector, including the human capital result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i2.954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i2.954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诚信作为一个概念,通常与两个独立的范围之一相关联并由其衡量:个人或组织。本文认为,在学校或大学等教育机构中,不应该将个人和组织的概念分开来进行诚信测量。此外,教育部门的诚信往往只是从学术的角度来讨论,比如在课堂或研究活动中作弊、抄袭或其他不当行为。本文的度量概念还包括行政服务、财务管理和采购等非学术方面。本文的教育诚信结合了性格维度(Istiani, 2015)、企业伦理价值模型(Kaptein, 2007)和KPK从各种资源中编制的教育腐败行为分类(2018)三个概念。综上所述,教育诚信的概念应该是一个整体的概念,可以从学生的诚信特征、影响学生的生态系统以及学校治理的合规水平三个方面来评估。这一提出的概念试图在鼓励教育利益相关者大规模和系统地评估教育部门诚信改善的成就,包括人力资本结果方面发挥战略作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education integrity survey: A suggested measurement of integrity in education sector
Integrity as a concept is usually associated with and measured by one of two separate scopes: personal or organizational. This paper argues that in educational institutions such as schools or universities, integrity measurement should not be done by separating personal and organizational concepts. In addition, integrity in education sector is often discussed just from academic perspective such as cheating, plagiarism or other wrongdoings in classroom or research activity. The measurement concept in this paper also includes non-academic aspects such as administrative services, financial management, and procurement. Educational integrity in this paper combines three concepts which are the character dimension (Istiani, 2015), the Corporate Ethical Value model (Kaptein, 2007), and the classification of corrupt behaviors in education compiled by KPK from various resources (2018). To conclude, the concept of educational integrity should be looked as holistic one which can be assessed from the integrity character of students, the ecosystem that influences them, and also the compliance level of school’s governance. This offered concept tries to fulfill the strategic role in encouraging educational stakeholders to massively and systematically evaluate the achievement of integrity improvement in the education sector, including the human capital result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信