公共债务对经济增长有害吗?来自斯里兰卡的新证据

Thilak Ranjeewa Priyadarshana
{"title":"公共债务对经济增长有害吗?来自斯里兰卡的新证据","authors":"Thilak Ranjeewa Priyadarshana","doi":"10.4038/ss.v49i1.4716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of public debt on economic growth and investment in Sri Lanka during the period from 1977 to 2017. The two model specifications, growth model and investment model, are estimated using the Johansen Cointegration technique and the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) specified under the Vector Auto Regressive (VAR) framework using annual data for the period of 1977-2017. The results of the two models reveal that public debt, which consists of foreign debt and domestic debt, has a significant and positive impact on economic growth and investment in the long run. In the short run, a significant association between public domestic debt and economic growth as well as total public debt and investment is observed, suggesting mixed results. Debt service payments in the long run show a significant negative effect on both economic growth and investment, reflecting a crowding out investment. The finding suggests that using government debt for priority investment expenditures with a prudent debt management strategy to curtail the impact of crowding out investment will have a favourable impact on economic growth of the country, particularly in the long run.","PeriodicalId":362386,"journal":{"name":"Staff Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Public Debt Harmful Towards Economic Growth? New Evidence from Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Thilak Ranjeewa Priyadarshana\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/ss.v49i1.4716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the impact of public debt on economic growth and investment in Sri Lanka during the period from 1977 to 2017. The two model specifications, growth model and investment model, are estimated using the Johansen Cointegration technique and the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) specified under the Vector Auto Regressive (VAR) framework using annual data for the period of 1977-2017. The results of the two models reveal that public debt, which consists of foreign debt and domestic debt, has a significant and positive impact on economic growth and investment in the long run. In the short run, a significant association between public domestic debt and economic growth as well as total public debt and investment is observed, suggesting mixed results. Debt service payments in the long run show a significant negative effect on both economic growth and investment, reflecting a crowding out investment. The finding suggests that using government debt for priority investment expenditures with a prudent debt management strategy to curtail the impact of crowding out investment will have a favourable impact on economic growth of the country, particularly in the long run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":362386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Staff Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Staff Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/ss.v49i1.4716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Staff Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/ss.v49i1.4716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究考察了1977年至2017年斯里兰卡公共债务对经济增长和投资的影响。使用1977-2017年的年度数据,使用Johansen协整技术和向量自回归(VAR)框架下指定的向量误差修正模型(VECM)对增长模型和投资模型这两个模型规格进行了估计。两个模型的结果表明,公共债务(由外债和内债组成)在长期内对经济增长和投资具有显著的正向影响。在短期内,国内公共债务与经济增长以及公共债务总额与投资之间存在显著关联,这表明结果好坏参半。长期来看,偿债对经济增长和投资都有显著的负面影响,反映出对投资的挤出。调查结果表明,将政府债务用于优先投资支出,并采取审慎的债务管理战略,以减少挤出投资的影响,将对该国的经济增长产生有利影响,特别是从长期来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Public Debt Harmful Towards Economic Growth? New Evidence from Sri Lanka
This study examines the impact of public debt on economic growth and investment in Sri Lanka during the period from 1977 to 2017. The two model specifications, growth model and investment model, are estimated using the Johansen Cointegration technique and the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) specified under the Vector Auto Regressive (VAR) framework using annual data for the period of 1977-2017. The results of the two models reveal that public debt, which consists of foreign debt and domestic debt, has a significant and positive impact on economic growth and investment in the long run. In the short run, a significant association between public domestic debt and economic growth as well as total public debt and investment is observed, suggesting mixed results. Debt service payments in the long run show a significant negative effect on both economic growth and investment, reflecting a crowding out investment. The finding suggests that using government debt for priority investment expenditures with a prudent debt management strategy to curtail the impact of crowding out investment will have a favourable impact on economic growth of the country, particularly in the long run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信