小房子

H. Shearer
{"title":"小房子","authors":"H. Shearer","doi":"10.1201/b22317-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tiny house movement in Australia is increasingly popular. It has been touted as a (part) solution to such intractable problems as housing unaffordability, urban sprawl, homelessness and unsustainable housing. Is this hype justified, and has the ‘love’ of tiny houses resulted in increasing numbers of tiny house dwellers? This paper reports on a research project comprising three questionnaire surveys, social media analysis and informal interviews of those who love, live and leave tiny houses. Demographically, those who lived in tiny houses were younger (under 30) or older (over 55). Most were single or couples, although a few had young children, and a cluster of single women over 55 was evident. The benefits of living tiny included reduced debt, being part of the tiny house community, sustainable living and the 'freedom' to move with one's own home. This freedom was often perceived rather than actual, as local government restrictions on tiny houses remains the most challenging barrier to tiny houses, and often the main reason for leaving for more conventional dwellings. Other issues included difficulties raising children in small spaces, especially in winter; and small space pragmatics such as composting toilets and cooking smells. In conclusion, tiny houses offer some potential to improve housing choice for those who can afford the upfront cost, may offer low impact urban densification option and can foster more sustainable behaviours. This potential will however, not be achieved unless local and state governments regulate tiny houses as a lawful dwelling type.","PeriodicalId":163262,"journal":{"name":"Greening Affordable Housing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tiny Houses\",\"authors\":\"H. Shearer\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/b22317-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tiny house movement in Australia is increasingly popular. It has been touted as a (part) solution to such intractable problems as housing unaffordability, urban sprawl, homelessness and unsustainable housing. Is this hype justified, and has the ‘love’ of tiny houses resulted in increasing numbers of tiny house dwellers? This paper reports on a research project comprising three questionnaire surveys, social media analysis and informal interviews of those who love, live and leave tiny houses. Demographically, those who lived in tiny houses were younger (under 30) or older (over 55). Most were single or couples, although a few had young children, and a cluster of single women over 55 was evident. The benefits of living tiny included reduced debt, being part of the tiny house community, sustainable living and the 'freedom' to move with one's own home. This freedom was often perceived rather than actual, as local government restrictions on tiny houses remains the most challenging barrier to tiny houses, and often the main reason for leaving for more conventional dwellings. Other issues included difficulties raising children in small spaces, especially in winter; and small space pragmatics such as composting toilets and cooking smells. In conclusion, tiny houses offer some potential to improve housing choice for those who can afford the upfront cost, may offer low impact urban densification option and can foster more sustainable behaviours. This potential will however, not be achieved unless local and state governments regulate tiny houses as a lawful dwelling type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greening Affordable Housing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greening Affordable Housing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/b22317-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greening Affordable Housing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/b22317-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tiny Houses
The tiny house movement in Australia is increasingly popular. It has been touted as a (part) solution to such intractable problems as housing unaffordability, urban sprawl, homelessness and unsustainable housing. Is this hype justified, and has the ‘love’ of tiny houses resulted in increasing numbers of tiny house dwellers? This paper reports on a research project comprising three questionnaire surveys, social media analysis and informal interviews of those who love, live and leave tiny houses. Demographically, those who lived in tiny houses were younger (under 30) or older (over 55). Most were single or couples, although a few had young children, and a cluster of single women over 55 was evident. The benefits of living tiny included reduced debt, being part of the tiny house community, sustainable living and the 'freedom' to move with one's own home. This freedom was often perceived rather than actual, as local government restrictions on tiny houses remains the most challenging barrier to tiny houses, and often the main reason for leaving for more conventional dwellings. Other issues included difficulties raising children in small spaces, especially in winter; and small space pragmatics such as composting toilets and cooking smells. In conclusion, tiny houses offer some potential to improve housing choice for those who can afford the upfront cost, may offer low impact urban densification option and can foster more sustainable behaviours. This potential will however, not be achieved unless local and state governments regulate tiny houses as a lawful dwelling type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信