骨头和政体?新石器-早期铁器时代爱琴海构造沉积历时分析

V. Isaakidou, P. Halstead
{"title":"骨头和政体?新石器-早期铁器时代爱琴海构造沉积历时分析","authors":"V. Isaakidou, P. Halstead","doi":"10.30549/actaath-4-55-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The meanings of the terms “ritual” and “sacrifice” are discussed as a basis for considering whether and how animal bones might be recognized as remnants of ritual behaviour or sacrifice. These methodological issues are explored “in practice”, taking structured deposits of burnt bones from the Mycenaean “Palace of Nestor” at Pylos as a case study. The paper then places this and other apparent examples of Mycenaean animal sacrifice in a wider context, by examining zooarchaeological evidence for anatomically selective manipulation and for deliberate or “structured” deposition of animal bones from the Neolithic to Early Iron Age in the Aegean. It is argued that anatomically selective treatment and structured deposition of bones increase through time and that these tendencies are matched by changes in the treatment of human remains, in the form and deposition of ceramics associated with commensality, and in architectural organization of space. These trends reflect not only increasing elaboration of material culture but also increasing qualitative, spatial and temporal differentiation of social life. Although the precise form and meaning of Mycenaean sacrificial ritual may be difficult to discern, its material traces mirror and probably helped to promote radical social change during the Aegean Bronze Age.","PeriodicalId":351535,"journal":{"name":"Bones, behaviour and belief. The zooarchaeological evidence as a source for ritual practice in ancient Greece and beyond","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bones and the body politic? A diachronic analysis of structured deposition in the Neolithic–Early Iron Age Aegean\",\"authors\":\"V. Isaakidou, P. Halstead\",\"doi\":\"10.30549/actaath-4-55-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The meanings of the terms “ritual” and “sacrifice” are discussed as a basis for considering whether and how animal bones might be recognized as remnants of ritual behaviour or sacrifice. These methodological issues are explored “in practice”, taking structured deposits of burnt bones from the Mycenaean “Palace of Nestor” at Pylos as a case study. The paper then places this and other apparent examples of Mycenaean animal sacrifice in a wider context, by examining zooarchaeological evidence for anatomically selective manipulation and for deliberate or “structured” deposition of animal bones from the Neolithic to Early Iron Age in the Aegean. It is argued that anatomically selective treatment and structured deposition of bones increase through time and that these tendencies are matched by changes in the treatment of human remains, in the form and deposition of ceramics associated with commensality, and in architectural organization of space. These trends reflect not only increasing elaboration of material culture but also increasing qualitative, spatial and temporal differentiation of social life. Although the precise form and meaning of Mycenaean sacrificial ritual may be difficult to discern, its material traces mirror and probably helped to promote radical social change during the Aegean Bronze Age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bones, behaviour and belief. The zooarchaeological evidence as a source for ritual practice in ancient Greece and beyond\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bones, behaviour and belief. The zooarchaeological evidence as a source for ritual practice in ancient Greece and beyond\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30549/actaath-4-55-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bones, behaviour and belief. The zooarchaeological evidence as a source for ritual practice in ancient Greece and beyond","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30549/actaath-4-55-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

讨论“仪式”和“祭祀”这两个术语的含义,作为考虑是否以及如何将动物骨头视为仪式行为或祭祀的残余的基础。这些方法论问题在“实践”中进行了探索,以皮洛斯迈锡尼“内斯特宫殿”中烧焦的骨骼的结构沉积物为例进行了研究。然后,通过检查动物考古学的证据,研究从新石器时代到早期铁器时代在爱琴海的解剖选择性操纵和故意或“有组织”的动物骨骼沉积,论文将这个和其他明显的迈锡尼动物祭祀的例子放在更广泛的背景下。有人认为,解剖学上的选择性处理和骨骼的结构沉积随着时间的推移而增加,这些趋势与人类遗骸处理的变化相匹配,与共生有关的陶瓷的形式和沉积,以及空间的建筑组织。这些趋势不仅反映了物质文化的日益精致,也反映了社会生活在质量、空间和时间上的日益分化。尽管迈锡尼祭祀仪式的确切形式和意义可能很难辨别,但它的物质痕迹反映并可能有助于促进爱琴海青铜时代的激进社会变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bones and the body politic? A diachronic analysis of structured deposition in the Neolithic–Early Iron Age Aegean
The meanings of the terms “ritual” and “sacrifice” are discussed as a basis for considering whether and how animal bones might be recognized as remnants of ritual behaviour or sacrifice. These methodological issues are explored “in practice”, taking structured deposits of burnt bones from the Mycenaean “Palace of Nestor” at Pylos as a case study. The paper then places this and other apparent examples of Mycenaean animal sacrifice in a wider context, by examining zooarchaeological evidence for anatomically selective manipulation and for deliberate or “structured” deposition of animal bones from the Neolithic to Early Iron Age in the Aegean. It is argued that anatomically selective treatment and structured deposition of bones increase through time and that these tendencies are matched by changes in the treatment of human remains, in the form and deposition of ceramics associated with commensality, and in architectural organization of space. These trends reflect not only increasing elaboration of material culture but also increasing qualitative, spatial and temporal differentiation of social life. Although the precise form and meaning of Mycenaean sacrificial ritual may be difficult to discern, its material traces mirror and probably helped to promote radical social change during the Aegean Bronze Age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信