信息威胁的综合列表

D. Parker
{"title":"信息威胁的综合列表","authors":"D. Parker","doi":"10.1080/19393559308551348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policies, standards, surveys, and assessment questionnaires do not currently provide consistent or complete lists of threats to information for identifying controls, conducting assessments, or establishing priorities in information security. The usual short list of four common threats — unauthorized modification, unauthorized use, destruction, and disclosure — is clearly incomplete and redundant. For example, more extensive lists often include fraud, theft, sabotage, and espionage. However, these threats are legal abstractions that require expertise in criminal law to understand. Often, users and even security specialists don't understand the criminal legal implications of these terms or have a distorted view of them. A further problem is that these lists typically fail to include some of the most common threats to organizations as shown by actual experience of information loss. These include such important violations of the law as trespass, burglary, extortion, and larceny, as well as such general threat...","PeriodicalId":207082,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive List of Threats To Information\",\"authors\":\"D. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19393559308551348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policies, standards, surveys, and assessment questionnaires do not currently provide consistent or complete lists of threats to information for identifying controls, conducting assessments, or establishing priorities in information security. The usual short list of four common threats — unauthorized modification, unauthorized use, destruction, and disclosure — is clearly incomplete and redundant. For example, more extensive lists often include fraud, theft, sabotage, and espionage. However, these threats are legal abstractions that require expertise in criminal law to understand. Often, users and even security specialists don't understand the criminal legal implications of these terms or have a distorted view of them. A further problem is that these lists typically fail to include some of the most common threats to organizations as shown by actual experience of information loss. These include such important violations of the law as trespass, burglary, extortion, and larceny, as well as such general threat...\",\"PeriodicalId\":207082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19393559308551348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19393559308551348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策、标准、调查和评估问卷目前没有提供一致的或完整的信息威胁列表,用于识别控制、进行评估或建立信息安全的优先级。通常四种常见威胁的简短列表——未经授权的修改、未经授权的使用、破坏和泄露——显然是不完整和多余的。例如,更广泛的清单通常包括欺诈、盗窃、破坏和间谍活动。然而,这些威胁是法律上的抽象概念,需要刑法方面的专业知识才能理解。通常,用户甚至安全专家都不理解这些术语的刑事法律含义,或者对它们有扭曲的看法。进一步的问题是,这些列表通常没有包括组织所面临的一些最常见的威胁,正如信息丢失的实际经验所示。这些包括非法侵入、入室盗窃、敲诈勒索和盗窃等重大违法行为,以及这种一般威胁……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comprehensive List of Threats To Information
Policies, standards, surveys, and assessment questionnaires do not currently provide consistent or complete lists of threats to information for identifying controls, conducting assessments, or establishing priorities in information security. The usual short list of four common threats — unauthorized modification, unauthorized use, destruction, and disclosure — is clearly incomplete and redundant. For example, more extensive lists often include fraud, theft, sabotage, and espionage. However, these threats are legal abstractions that require expertise in criminal law to understand. Often, users and even security specialists don't understand the criminal legal implications of these terms or have a distorted view of them. A further problem is that these lists typically fail to include some of the most common threats to organizations as shown by actual experience of information loss. These include such important violations of the law as trespass, burglary, extortion, and larceny, as well as such general threat...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信