实地骚扰:性别、种族、国家和民族志知识的构建

Rebecca Hanson, Patricia Richards
{"title":"实地骚扰:性别、种族、国家和民族志知识的构建","authors":"Rebecca Hanson, Patricia Richards","doi":"10.32735/S0718-6568/2021-N59-1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual harassment and sexualization are common experiences for women researchers as they conduct fieldwork. Yet, these topics are rarely mentioned in books and classes on qualitative methods. This article, based on interviews with qualitative researchers (47 women and nine men) from the North American academy, criticizes the silence around sexual harassment in the field. We argue that this silence is an indicator of a larger problem: the elimination of embodied experiences in qualitative research. This disciplinary silence around sexual harassment has costs for both researchers themselves as well as the construction of ethnographic knowledge. We propose that qualitative researchers think critically about how their fieldwork and data are shaped by gender, race, sexuality, and nationality, calling for the inclusion of embodied experiences in a way that recognizes these as mutually constitutive of the production of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":377130,"journal":{"name":"Polis (Santiago)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acosadas en terreno: El género, la raza, la nación y la construcción del conocimiento etnográfico\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Hanson, Patricia Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.32735/S0718-6568/2021-N59-1589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sexual harassment and sexualization are common experiences for women researchers as they conduct fieldwork. Yet, these topics are rarely mentioned in books and classes on qualitative methods. This article, based on interviews with qualitative researchers (47 women and nine men) from the North American academy, criticizes the silence around sexual harassment in the field. We argue that this silence is an indicator of a larger problem: the elimination of embodied experiences in qualitative research. This disciplinary silence around sexual harassment has costs for both researchers themselves as well as the construction of ethnographic knowledge. We propose that qualitative researchers think critically about how their fieldwork and data are shaped by gender, race, sexuality, and nationality, calling for the inclusion of embodied experiences in a way that recognizes these as mutually constitutive of the production of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polis (Santiago)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polis (Santiago)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-6568/2021-N59-1589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polis (Santiago)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-6568/2021-N59-1589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性骚扰和性化是女性研究人员在进行田野调查时的常见经历。然而,这些主题在定性方法的书籍和课程中很少被提及。这篇文章基于对来自北美学术界的定性研究人员(47名女性和9名男性)的采访,批评了该领域对性骚扰的沉默。我们认为,这种沉默表明了一个更大的问题:在定性研究中消除了具体化的经验。这种关于性骚扰的学科沉默对研究人员本身和民族志知识的构建都有代价。我们建议定性研究人员批判性地思考他们的田野工作和数据是如何被性别、种族、性取向和国籍所塑造的,并呼吁以一种认识到这些经验是知识生产的相互构成的方式纳入具体化的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acosadas en terreno: El género, la raza, la nación y la construcción del conocimiento etnográfico
Sexual harassment and sexualization are common experiences for women researchers as they conduct fieldwork. Yet, these topics are rarely mentioned in books and classes on qualitative methods. This article, based on interviews with qualitative researchers (47 women and nine men) from the North American academy, criticizes the silence around sexual harassment in the field. We argue that this silence is an indicator of a larger problem: the elimination of embodied experiences in qualitative research. This disciplinary silence around sexual harassment has costs for both researchers themselves as well as the construction of ethnographic knowledge. We propose that qualitative researchers think critically about how their fieldwork and data are shaped by gender, race, sexuality, and nationality, calling for the inclusion of embodied experiences in a way that recognizes these as mutually constitutive of the production of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信