税收不清楚是什么?

Leonard Etel
{"title":"税收不清楚是什么?","authors":"Leonard Etel","doi":"10.15290/acr.2021-2022.14-15.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Property tax is the second, after VAT, most contested issue to administrative courts. The reason for such a situation is wrongly determined subject of tax. This paper presents basic weaknesses of the regulations regarding buildings, structures and land. These problems may be eliminated only by radical changes in the binding law. Without them, this tax will still cause difficulties in its practical implementation.","PeriodicalId":273392,"journal":{"name":"Annual Center Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax not clear on what?\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Etel\",\"doi\":\"10.15290/acr.2021-2022.14-15.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Property tax is the second, after VAT, most contested issue to administrative courts. The reason for such a situation is wrongly determined subject of tax. This paper presents basic weaknesses of the regulations regarding buildings, structures and land. These problems may be eliminated only by radical changes in the binding law. Without them, this tax will still cause difficulties in its practical implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Center Review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Center Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15290/acr.2021-2022.14-15.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Center Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/acr.2021-2022.14-15.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财产税是继增值税之后,行政法院争议最大的第二个问题。造成这种情况的原因是错误地确定了税收主体。本文介绍了我国建筑、构筑物和土地法规的基本缺陷。这些问题只有通过彻底改变约束性法律才能消除。没有他们,这项税收在实际实施中仍然会遇到困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tax not clear on what?
Property tax is the second, after VAT, most contested issue to administrative courts. The reason for such a situation is wrongly determined subject of tax. This paper presents basic weaknesses of the regulations regarding buildings, structures and land. These problems may be eliminated only by radical changes in the binding law. Without them, this tax will still cause difficulties in its practical implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信