连接的点

Brooks Hamilton
{"title":"连接的点","authors":"Brooks Hamilton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1079830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Connecting the Dots has become one of those phrases we often hear. The phrase harkens back to those old kids puzzles where there would be a bunch of numbered dots on a page. The child would draw a line from one number to the next in number sequence and a picture would emerge from the previous chaos. In this article we will examine whether just two dots can be connected in such a manner that a clear picture would emerge - dots that are well known and in plain view. · The first dot is: ERISA Fiduciary Responsibilities · The second dot is: Retiring in Dignity Does connectivity exist between these two known and clearly visible dots? Stated in perhaps a more purposeful Way, if most of the employees working for XYZ Corporation will retire in dignity, is it reasonable to conclude that XYZ's ERISA fiduciaries have probably met their fiduciary responsibility? Alternatively, if most employees working for XYZ Corporation will retire in despair, could one reasonably argue that XYZ's ERISA fiduciaries have probably failed to meet their fiduciary responsibility?","PeriodicalId":201085,"journal":{"name":"BHNP: Public Policy (Topic)","volume":"229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connecting Dots\",\"authors\":\"Brooks Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1079830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Connecting the Dots has become one of those phrases we often hear. The phrase harkens back to those old kids puzzles where there would be a bunch of numbered dots on a page. The child would draw a line from one number to the next in number sequence and a picture would emerge from the previous chaos. In this article we will examine whether just two dots can be connected in such a manner that a clear picture would emerge - dots that are well known and in plain view. · The first dot is: ERISA Fiduciary Responsibilities · The second dot is: Retiring in Dignity Does connectivity exist between these two known and clearly visible dots? Stated in perhaps a more purposeful Way, if most of the employees working for XYZ Corporation will retire in dignity, is it reasonable to conclude that XYZ's ERISA fiduciaries have probably met their fiduciary responsibility? Alternatively, if most employees working for XYZ Corporation will retire in despair, could one reasonably argue that XYZ's ERISA fiduciaries have probably failed to meet their fiduciary responsibility?\",\"PeriodicalId\":201085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BHNP: Public Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"229 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BHNP: Public Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1079830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BHNP: Public Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1079830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

串连点点滴滴已经成为我们经常听到的短语之一。这句话让人想起了那些老孩子的谜题,在书页上有一堆编号的点。孩子们会按照数字顺序从一个数字到下一个数字画一条线,一幅图画就会从之前的混乱中浮现出来。在这篇文章中,我们将研究是否只有两个点可以以这样一种方式连接起来,从而出现一幅清晰的画面——众所周知的、显而易见的点。·第一个点是:ERISA信托责任·第二个点是:体面退休这两个已知且清晰可见的点之间是否存在联系?以一种更有目的的方式陈述,如果为XYZ公司工作的大多数员工将体面地退休,那么得出XYZ的ERISA受托人可能已经履行了他们的受托责任的结论是否合理?或者,如果为XYZ公司工作的大多数员工将在绝望中退休,人们是否可以合理地辩称,XYZ的ERISA受托人可能未能履行其受托责任?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Connecting Dots
Connecting the Dots has become one of those phrases we often hear. The phrase harkens back to those old kids puzzles where there would be a bunch of numbered dots on a page. The child would draw a line from one number to the next in number sequence and a picture would emerge from the previous chaos. In this article we will examine whether just two dots can be connected in such a manner that a clear picture would emerge - dots that are well known and in plain view. · The first dot is: ERISA Fiduciary Responsibilities · The second dot is: Retiring in Dignity Does connectivity exist between these two known and clearly visible dots? Stated in perhaps a more purposeful Way, if most of the employees working for XYZ Corporation will retire in dignity, is it reasonable to conclude that XYZ's ERISA fiduciaries have probably met their fiduciary responsibility? Alternatively, if most employees working for XYZ Corporation will retire in despair, could one reasonably argue that XYZ's ERISA fiduciaries have probably failed to meet their fiduciary responsibility?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信