分析MINAHASA区域公共工程部的政府责任报告

Jenefer Hermina Worotikan, J. Sondakh, Hendrik Gamaliel
{"title":"分析MINAHASA区域公共工程部的政府责任报告","authors":"Jenefer Hermina Worotikan, J. Sondakh, Hendrik Gamaliel","doi":"10.32400/gc.13.04.21431.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Department of public work of Minahasa district is one of the agencies within the scope of governmental of Minahasa district which has responsibility to compose accountabilities Performance peport of Government instance. LAKIP is a form of the government accountability on  performance implementation which is carried out within a year estimates and as on of the manifestation of good governance. The purpose of this study was to analyze what factors caused the format of LAKIP formulation to the DPU not to fulfill the suitability of the elements of the formatting format in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform number 29 year 2010 consisting of executive summary, introduction, planning and agreement performance, performance accountability, strategic plan, annual performance plan form (CTR), key performance indicators (IKU), performance agreement form, closing, attachments. The elements that are not yet in accordance with the regulations are the main performance indicators, covers and attachments. The methods of data collection which is used are interviews and documentation. The method of analyses of data which used is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the format of the 2016 Minahasa DPU LAKIP drafting has largely compiled in accordance with PERMENPAN number 29 year 2010 but there are still elements in the format of the DPU LAKIP preparation that are not in accordance with the regulation.Keywords : LAKIP, good governance, accountability.","PeriodicalId":215849,"journal":{"name":"GOING CONCERN : JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS LAPORAN AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN MINAHASA\",\"authors\":\"Jenefer Hermina Worotikan, J. Sondakh, Hendrik Gamaliel\",\"doi\":\"10.32400/gc.13.04.21431.2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Department of public work of Minahasa district is one of the agencies within the scope of governmental of Minahasa district which has responsibility to compose accountabilities Performance peport of Government instance. LAKIP is a form of the government accountability on  performance implementation which is carried out within a year estimates and as on of the manifestation of good governance. The purpose of this study was to analyze what factors caused the format of LAKIP formulation to the DPU not to fulfill the suitability of the elements of the formatting format in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform number 29 year 2010 consisting of executive summary, introduction, planning and agreement performance, performance accountability, strategic plan, annual performance plan form (CTR), key performance indicators (IKU), performance agreement form, closing, attachments. The elements that are not yet in accordance with the regulations are the main performance indicators, covers and attachments. The methods of data collection which is used are interviews and documentation. The method of analyses of data which used is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the format of the 2016 Minahasa DPU LAKIP drafting has largely compiled in accordance with PERMENPAN number 29 year 2010 but there are still elements in the format of the DPU LAKIP preparation that are not in accordance with the regulation.Keywords : LAKIP, good governance, accountability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GOING CONCERN : JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GOING CONCERN : JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.04.21431.2018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GOING CONCERN : JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.04.21431.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

米纳哈萨地区公共工作部是米纳哈萨地区政府管辖范围内负责编写政府实例绩效报告的机构之一。LAKIP是政府对绩效执行的一种问责形式,在一年的估计期内进行,是良好治理的一种表现。本研究的目的是分析是什么因素导致LAKIP的格式不符合2010年第29号行政改革和官僚改革国务部长的规定,包括执行摘要、引言、计划和协议绩效、绩效问责制、战略计划、年度绩效计划表(CTR)。关键绩效指标(IKU)、绩效协议表格、结案、附件。尚不符合规定的要素为主要绩效指标、封面和附件。所使用的数据收集方法是访谈和文献记录。所使用的数据分析方法是描述性定性的。本研究的结果表明,2016年Minahasa DPU LAKIP起草的格式在很大程度上是根据PERMENPAN 2010年第29号编制的,但DPU LAKIP编写的格式中仍有不符合规定的要素。关键词:LAKIP、善治、问责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS LAPORAN AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN MINAHASA
Department of public work of Minahasa district is one of the agencies within the scope of governmental of Minahasa district which has responsibility to compose accountabilities Performance peport of Government instance. LAKIP is a form of the government accountability on  performance implementation which is carried out within a year estimates and as on of the manifestation of good governance. The purpose of this study was to analyze what factors caused the format of LAKIP formulation to the DPU not to fulfill the suitability of the elements of the formatting format in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform number 29 year 2010 consisting of executive summary, introduction, planning and agreement performance, performance accountability, strategic plan, annual performance plan form (CTR), key performance indicators (IKU), performance agreement form, closing, attachments. The elements that are not yet in accordance with the regulations are the main performance indicators, covers and attachments. The methods of data collection which is used are interviews and documentation. The method of analyses of data which used is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the format of the 2016 Minahasa DPU LAKIP drafting has largely compiled in accordance with PERMENPAN number 29 year 2010 but there are still elements in the format of the DPU LAKIP preparation that are not in accordance with the regulation.Keywords : LAKIP, good governance, accountability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信