基于2007年第40号有限公司法的公司解散中股东权利的法律保护(以最高法院第1618 k / pdt /2016号决定为例)

Tengku Agung Kurniawan
{"title":"基于2007年第40号有限公司法的公司解散中股东权利的法律保护(以最高法院第1618 k / pdt /2016号决定为例)","authors":"Tengku Agung Kurniawan","doi":"10.30652/ml.v5i2.7835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dissolution of a limited liability company is regulated in Article 142-146 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1618 K/Pdt/2016 where one of the requirements for the application for the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company is to notify the tax agency that the company has been inactive for 3 (three) years or more which must be carried out by the Board of Directors. Whereas in the case of the dissolution of the company through a court order in article 146 paragraph 1 letter c it states that the district court may dissolve the company at the request of the shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Board of Commissioners based on the reasons that the company is not possible to continue.","PeriodicalId":304890,"journal":{"name":"Melayunesia Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEGAL PROTECTION OF SHAREHOLDER’S RIGHT IN OF DISSOLUTION COMPANY BASED ON LAW NUMBER 40 OF 2007 REGARDING LIMITED COMPANIES (CASE STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION NUMBER 1618 K/PDT/2016)\",\"authors\":\"Tengku Agung Kurniawan\",\"doi\":\"10.30652/ml.v5i2.7835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dissolution of a limited liability company is regulated in Article 142-146 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1618 K/Pdt/2016 where one of the requirements for the application for the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company is to notify the tax agency that the company has been inactive for 3 (three) years or more which must be carried out by the Board of Directors. Whereas in the case of the dissolution of the company through a court order in article 146 paragraph 1 letter c it states that the district court may dissolve the company at the request of the shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Board of Commissioners based on the reasons that the company is not possible to continue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melayunesia Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melayunesia Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v5i2.7835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melayunesia Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v5i2.7835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2007年关于有限责任公司的第40号法律第142-146条规定了有限责任公司的解散。在最高法院第1618 K/Pdt/2016号决定的情况下,申请解散有限责任公司的要求之一是通知税务机关该公司已不活跃三(三)年或更长时间,这必须由董事会执行。而在第146条第1款(c)项中通过法院命令解散公司的情况下,规定地方法院可应股东、董事会或监事会基于公司无法继续存在的理由的请求解散公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LEGAL PROTECTION OF SHAREHOLDER’S RIGHT IN OF DISSOLUTION COMPANY BASED ON LAW NUMBER 40 OF 2007 REGARDING LIMITED COMPANIES (CASE STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION NUMBER 1618 K/PDT/2016)
The dissolution of a limited liability company is regulated in Article 142-146 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the case of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1618 K/Pdt/2016 where one of the requirements for the application for the dissolution of a Limited Liability Company is to notify the tax agency that the company has been inactive for 3 (three) years or more which must be carried out by the Board of Directors. Whereas in the case of the dissolution of the company through a court order in article 146 paragraph 1 letter c it states that the district court may dissolve the company at the request of the shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Board of Commissioners based on the reasons that the company is not possible to continue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信