伦理的“本质”,同时(数字化)归档他者

Bibhushana Poudyal
{"title":"伦理的“本质”,同时(数字化)归档他者","authors":"Bibhushana Poudyal","doi":"10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article begins with an introduction to my digital archival project, the deconstructive approach in it, and the questions that are guiding both the project and the article. Then, I present the ethical dilemmas I encountered after I decided to build a digital archive. I connect these dilemmas with the—witting or otherwise—orientalist pattern behind two of the West-based digital archival projects about Nepal and South Asia. I also introduce the metaphor of pharmakon and argue for the need to interrogate archival performances through the questions of ethics. Through the discussion of my project, I attempt to offer, not a manifesto on ethical digital archives, but a possibility of making digital archives hospitable to the Other by building a dialectical relationship with the communities. My project, Rethinking South Asia from the Borderlands via Critical Digital A(na)rchiving, is a Nepali researcher’s humble, stubborn, and sincere effort/experiment of building a digital archive by bringing together community-praxis and deconstructive approaches. I aim to see if a dialogic room in digital archives can be built for and with the Other. I use the discussion of my project to raise some of the hardest questions and to offer a glimpse at the “nature” of ethics that archivists must unconditionally pursue while (digitally) archiving the Other.1 [Impossible archival imaginaries] explain[] how archival imaginaries may work in situations where the archive and its hoped-for contents are absent or forever unattainable. —Anne Gilliland & Michelle Caswell, “Records and Their Imaginaries: Imagining the Impossible, Making Possible the Imagined” Yes, the archive is an instrument of power. It is a technology of rule. A set of apparatuses producing and reproducing dominant narratives. An omnipotence-other. But it is also a subversive space. It is about a feigning and a fomentation, a resisting. It is a domain hospitable to resistance. — Verne Harris, Archives and Justice: A South African Perspective Figure 1: Image of Commuters in a public vehicle in","PeriodicalId":201634,"journal":{"name":"Across the Disciplines","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The �Nature� of Ethics while (Digitally) Archiving the Other\",\"authors\":\"Bibhushana Poudyal\",\"doi\":\"10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article begins with an introduction to my digital archival project, the deconstructive approach in it, and the questions that are guiding both the project and the article. Then, I present the ethical dilemmas I encountered after I decided to build a digital archive. I connect these dilemmas with the—witting or otherwise—orientalist pattern behind two of the West-based digital archival projects about Nepal and South Asia. I also introduce the metaphor of pharmakon and argue for the need to interrogate archival performances through the questions of ethics. Through the discussion of my project, I attempt to offer, not a manifesto on ethical digital archives, but a possibility of making digital archives hospitable to the Other by building a dialectical relationship with the communities. My project, Rethinking South Asia from the Borderlands via Critical Digital A(na)rchiving, is a Nepali researcher’s humble, stubborn, and sincere effort/experiment of building a digital archive by bringing together community-praxis and deconstructive approaches. I aim to see if a dialogic room in digital archives can be built for and with the Other. I use the discussion of my project to raise some of the hardest questions and to offer a glimpse at the “nature” of ethics that archivists must unconditionally pursue while (digitally) archiving the Other.1 [Impossible archival imaginaries] explain[] how archival imaginaries may work in situations where the archive and its hoped-for contents are absent or forever unattainable. —Anne Gilliland & Michelle Caswell, “Records and Their Imaginaries: Imagining the Impossible, Making Possible the Imagined” Yes, the archive is an instrument of power. It is a technology of rule. A set of apparatuses producing and reproducing dominant narratives. An omnipotence-other. But it is also a subversive space. It is about a feigning and a fomentation, a resisting. It is a domain hospitable to resistance. — Verne Harris, Archives and Justice: A South African Perspective Figure 1: Image of Commuters in a public vehicle in\",\"PeriodicalId\":201634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Across the Disciplines\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Across the Disciplines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Across the Disciplines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

文章首先介绍了我的数字档案项目,其中的解构方法,以及指导项目和文章的问题。然后,我将介绍我在决定建立数字档案后遇到的伦理困境。我将这些困境与两个以西方为基础的关于尼泊尔和南亚的数字档案项目背后的智慧或东方主义模式联系起来。我还介绍了制药的隐喻,并论证了通过伦理问题来质疑档案表演的必要性。通过对我的项目的讨论,我试图提供的不是关于伦理数字档案的宣言,而是通过与社区建立辩证关系,使数字档案对他者友好的可能性。我的项目“通过批判性数字A(na)积累从边疆重新思考南亚”,是一位尼泊尔研究人员谦逊、固执和真诚的努力/实验,通过将社区实践和解构方法结合起来,建立一个数字档案。我的目标是看看能否在数字档案中为他者建立一个对话室,并与他者建立对话室。我通过对我的项目的讨论,提出了一些最难的问题,并对档案工作者在(数字)存档他者时必须无条件追求的伦理“本质”进行了一瞥。1[不可能的档案想象]解释了[]在档案及其期望的内容缺失或永远无法获得的情况下,档案想象如何发挥作用。——安妮·吉利兰和米歇尔·卡斯韦尔,《记录和他们的想象:想象不可能,让想象成为可能》是的,档案是权力的工具。这是一种统治技术。一套产生和再生产主导叙事的装置。一个omnipotence-other。但它也是一个颠覆性的空间。这是一种伪装,一种煽动,一种反抗。这是一个容易受到抵抗的领域。——凡尔纳·哈里斯,《档案与司法:南非视角》图1:南非公共交通工具中的通勤者图像
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The �Nature� of Ethics while (Digitally) Archiving the Other
The article begins with an introduction to my digital archival project, the deconstructive approach in it, and the questions that are guiding both the project and the article. Then, I present the ethical dilemmas I encountered after I decided to build a digital archive. I connect these dilemmas with the—witting or otherwise—orientalist pattern behind two of the West-based digital archival projects about Nepal and South Asia. I also introduce the metaphor of pharmakon and argue for the need to interrogate archival performances through the questions of ethics. Through the discussion of my project, I attempt to offer, not a manifesto on ethical digital archives, but a possibility of making digital archives hospitable to the Other by building a dialectical relationship with the communities. My project, Rethinking South Asia from the Borderlands via Critical Digital A(na)rchiving, is a Nepali researcher’s humble, stubborn, and sincere effort/experiment of building a digital archive by bringing together community-praxis and deconstructive approaches. I aim to see if a dialogic room in digital archives can be built for and with the Other. I use the discussion of my project to raise some of the hardest questions and to offer a glimpse at the “nature” of ethics that archivists must unconditionally pursue while (digitally) archiving the Other.1 [Impossible archival imaginaries] explain[] how archival imaginaries may work in situations where the archive and its hoped-for contents are absent or forever unattainable. —Anne Gilliland & Michelle Caswell, “Records and Their Imaginaries: Imagining the Impossible, Making Possible the Imagined” Yes, the archive is an instrument of power. It is a technology of rule. A set of apparatuses producing and reproducing dominant narratives. An omnipotence-other. But it is also a subversive space. It is about a feigning and a fomentation, a resisting. It is a domain hospitable to resistance. — Verne Harris, Archives and Justice: A South African Perspective Figure 1: Image of Commuters in a public vehicle in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信