政府在基于信仰的儿童医疗忽视案件中的作用

M. Jacobson
{"title":"政府在基于信仰的儿童医疗忽视案件中的作用","authors":"M. Jacobson","doi":"10.61366/2576-2176.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, parental rights have been defined by a strong liberal conception of individual rights, giving parents huge leeway in determining how their children are raised. In this paper, I examine one extreme example of parental rights gone wrong: faith based child medical neglect, a phenomenon that occurs when parents turn to faith healing for their children instead of standard medical care, resulting in the child’s death. First, I show how liberal theory has failed to address key questions regarding the limits of both parental and child rights as they apply to faith healing. Then I apply the republican concepts of civic virtue and non-arbitrary intervention to provide a framework that clearly lays out the limitations on both child and parental rights, as well as determining the specific circumstances under which the government may intervene in cases of faith healing. 2 Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 4 https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/horizons/vol4/iss1/4","PeriodicalId":113813,"journal":{"name":"Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Government in Cases of Faith Based Child Medical Neglect\",\"authors\":\"M. Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"10.61366/2576-2176.1041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, parental rights have been defined by a strong liberal conception of individual rights, giving parents huge leeway in determining how their children are raised. In this paper, I examine one extreme example of parental rights gone wrong: faith based child medical neglect, a phenomenon that occurs when parents turn to faith healing for their children instead of standard medical care, resulting in the child’s death. First, I show how liberal theory has failed to address key questions regarding the limits of both parental and child rights as they apply to faith healing. Then I apply the republican concepts of civic virtue and non-arbitrary intervention to provide a framework that clearly lays out the limitations on both child and parental rights, as well as determining the specific circumstances under which the government may intervene in cases of faith healing. 2 Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 4 https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/horizons/vol4/iss1/4\",\"PeriodicalId\":113813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61366/2576-2176.1041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61366/2576-2176.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,父母的权利是由一种强烈的自由主义的个人权利概念来定义的,这给了父母很大的余地来决定如何抚养孩子。在本文中,我研究了父母权利出错的一个极端例子:基于信仰的儿童医疗忽视,这种现象发生在父母为孩子求助于信仰治疗而不是标准医疗时,导致孩子死亡。首先,我展示了自由主义理论在应用于信仰治疗时,如何未能解决有关父母和儿童权利限制的关键问题。然后,我运用共和主义的公民美德和非任意干预的概念,提供了一个框架,清楚地列出了对儿童和父母权利的限制,并确定了政府在信仰治疗案例中可能进行干预的具体情况。2学术视野:明尼苏达大学,莫里斯本科生学报,Vol. 4, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 4 https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/horizons/vol4/iss1/4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Government in Cases of Faith Based Child Medical Neglect
In the United States, parental rights have been defined by a strong liberal conception of individual rights, giving parents huge leeway in determining how their children are raised. In this paper, I examine one extreme example of parental rights gone wrong: faith based child medical neglect, a phenomenon that occurs when parents turn to faith healing for their children instead of standard medical care, resulting in the child’s death. First, I show how liberal theory has failed to address key questions regarding the limits of both parental and child rights as they apply to faith healing. Then I apply the republican concepts of civic virtue and non-arbitrary intervention to provide a framework that clearly lays out the limitations on both child and parental rights, as well as determining the specific circumstances under which the government may intervene in cases of faith healing. 2 Scholarly Horizons: University of Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate Journal, Vol. 4, Iss. 1 [2017], Art. 4 https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/horizons/vol4/iss1/4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信