软件工程中的经验方法论

R. Dawson, Phil Bones, B. Oates, P. Brereton, M. Azuma, M. Jackson
{"title":"软件工程中的经验方法论","authors":"R. Dawson, Phil Bones, B. Oates, P. Brereton, M. Azuma, M. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2003.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collection and use of evidence in software engineering practice and research are essential elements in the development of the discipline. This paper discusses the need for evidence-based software engineering, the nature of evidence in its various forms and some of the research methodologies used in other disciplines for the collection of evidence, which are also relevant to software engineering. Two frameworks or models are proposed which illustrate the relationships between the methodologies discussed. In particular, the paper highlights the importance and roles of both positivist and interpretivist methods of investigation.","PeriodicalId":260047,"journal":{"name":"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical methodologies in software engineering\",\"authors\":\"R. Dawson, Phil Bones, B. Oates, P. Brereton, M. Azuma, M. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STEP.2003.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The collection and use of evidence in software engineering practice and research are essential elements in the development of the discipline. This paper discusses the need for evidence-based software engineering, the nature of evidence in its various forms and some of the research methodologies used in other disciplines for the collection of evidence, which are also relevant to software engineering. Two frameworks or models are proposed which illustrate the relationships between the methodologies discussed. In particular, the paper highlights the importance and roles of both positivist and interpretivist methods of investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2003.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2003.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

在软件工程实践和研究中收集和使用证据是该学科发展的基本要素。本文讨论了基于证据的软件工程的必要性,各种形式的证据的本质,以及在其他学科中用于收集证据的一些研究方法,这些方法也与软件工程相关。提出了两个框架或模型来说明所讨论的方法之间的关系。本文特别强调了实证主义和解释主义调查方法的重要性和作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical methodologies in software engineering
The collection and use of evidence in software engineering practice and research are essential elements in the development of the discipline. This paper discusses the need for evidence-based software engineering, the nature of evidence in its various forms and some of the research methodologies used in other disciplines for the collection of evidence, which are also relevant to software engineering. Two frameworks or models are proposed which illustrate the relationships between the methodologies discussed. In particular, the paper highlights the importance and roles of both positivist and interpretivist methods of investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信