第11章高海拔登山的制度工作:固定绳索、“珠穆朗玛峰斗殴”和夏尔巴人行为的变化

Marc Lenglet, P. Rozin
{"title":"第11章高海拔登山的制度工作:固定绳索、“珠穆朗玛峰斗殴”和夏尔巴人行为的变化","authors":"Marc Lenglet, P. Rozin","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000058013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter bridges two theoretical concerns: making sense of emancipatory processes within institutional work on the one hand and providing a more nuanced understanding of actorhood on the other hand. The authors develop the notion of ‘institutional co-appropriation work’ to characterise an emancipatory process whereby an institutionalised actor in a subaltern position manages to emancipate by appropriating some founding features of the elites position. The authors build on a case study focussing on the ‘Everest brawl’, an altercation high up on the mountain that revealed a critical evolution of sherpa actorhood. The authors analyse the struggles in the Nepalese mountaineering industry and show how sherpa actorhood is currently being reconfigured by the action of a few individuals willing to be recognised for their climbing abilities, and not their role as porters. This case epitomises the emergence of two distinct phenomena, explaining the magnitude of the event: the emergence of an empowered ‘new sherpa’ revealing heterogeneity of sherpa actorhood, in contrast to the accepted representations and the institutional work blurring the underlying rules and institutionalised roles of the mountaineering industry in Nepal. The implications for institutional work literature are twofold. First, the study of emancipatory processes benefits from more nuanced cases, where the actor in the subaltern position does not simply try to remove the dominant actor. Second, the notion of ‘actor’ within this stream of literature should not be taken-for-granted as is often the case.","PeriodicalId":419818,"journal":{"name":"Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 11 Institutional Work in High-altitude Mountaineering: Rope-fixing, the ‘Everest Brawl’ and Changes in Sherpa Actorhood\",\"authors\":\"Marc Lenglet, P. Rozin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S0733-558X20190000058013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThis chapter bridges two theoretical concerns: making sense of emancipatory processes within institutional work on the one hand and providing a more nuanced understanding of actorhood on the other hand. The authors develop the notion of ‘institutional co-appropriation work’ to characterise an emancipatory process whereby an institutionalised actor in a subaltern position manages to emancipate by appropriating some founding features of the elites position. The authors build on a case study focussing on the ‘Everest brawl’, an altercation high up on the mountain that revealed a critical evolution of sherpa actorhood. The authors analyse the struggles in the Nepalese mountaineering industry and show how sherpa actorhood is currently being reconfigured by the action of a few individuals willing to be recognised for their climbing abilities, and not their role as porters. This case epitomises the emergence of two distinct phenomena, explaining the magnitude of the event: the emergence of an empowered ‘new sherpa’ revealing heterogeneity of sherpa actorhood, in contrast to the accepted representations and the institutional work blurring the underlying rules and institutionalised roles of the mountaineering industry in Nepal. The implications for institutional work literature are twofold. First, the study of emancipatory processes benefits from more nuanced cases, where the actor in the subaltern position does not simply try to remove the dominant actor. Second, the notion of ‘actor’ within this stream of literature should not be taken-for-granted as is often the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000058013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000058013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本章将两个理论问题联系起来:一方面理解制度工作中的解放过程,另一方面提供对行为性更细致入微的理解。作者发展了“机构共同占有工作”的概念,以描述一个解放过程,即一个处于下层地位的制度化行动者通过挪用精英地位的一些基本特征来实现解放。作者以“珠穆朗玛峰争吵”为案例进行研究,这是一场发生在高山上的争吵,揭示了夏尔巴人行为方式的关键演变。作者分析了尼泊尔登山行业的挣扎,并展示了夏尔巴人的角色目前是如何被一些人的行为所重新配置的,这些人愿意以他们的登山能力而不是搬运工的角色得到认可。这个案例集中体现了两种不同现象的出现,解释了事件的严重性:一个被授权的“新夏尔巴人”的出现,揭示了夏尔巴人角色的异质性,与公认的表征和尼泊尔登山行业模糊的基本规则和制度化角色的机构工作形成对比。对制度工作文献的影响是双重的。首先,解放过程的研究受益于更细微的案例,在这些案例中,处于次等地位的行动者并不是简单地试图移除主导行动者。其次,在这一文学流中,“演员”的概念不应该被视为理所当然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 11 Institutional Work in High-altitude Mountaineering: Rope-fixing, the ‘Everest Brawl’ and Changes in Sherpa Actorhood
Abstract This chapter bridges two theoretical concerns: making sense of emancipatory processes within institutional work on the one hand and providing a more nuanced understanding of actorhood on the other hand. The authors develop the notion of ‘institutional co-appropriation work’ to characterise an emancipatory process whereby an institutionalised actor in a subaltern position manages to emancipate by appropriating some founding features of the elites position. The authors build on a case study focussing on the ‘Everest brawl’, an altercation high up on the mountain that revealed a critical evolution of sherpa actorhood. The authors analyse the struggles in the Nepalese mountaineering industry and show how sherpa actorhood is currently being reconfigured by the action of a few individuals willing to be recognised for their climbing abilities, and not their role as porters. This case epitomises the emergence of two distinct phenomena, explaining the magnitude of the event: the emergence of an empowered ‘new sherpa’ revealing heterogeneity of sherpa actorhood, in contrast to the accepted representations and the institutional work blurring the underlying rules and institutionalised roles of the mountaineering industry in Nepal. The implications for institutional work literature are twofold. First, the study of emancipatory processes benefits from more nuanced cases, where the actor in the subaltern position does not simply try to remove the dominant actor. Second, the notion of ‘actor’ within this stream of literature should not be taken-for-granted as is often the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信