论约翰·罗尔斯的正义理论

Viktoriya V. Solovyeva
{"title":"论约翰·罗尔斯的正义理论","authors":"Viktoriya V. Solovyeva","doi":"10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-167-177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political processes that took place in the world after the Second World War required a new philosophi-cal understanding, since the utilitarian approach, which dominated the Anglo-American political tradition for a long time, could not fully fulfill this task. John Rawls, from whom the revival of political philosophy began, proposed his own version of the solution of the accumulated theoretical problems, which met the social and po-litical demands of his time. Moreover, Rawls was practically the first to put justice at the center of political and philosophical thought. The problem of justice has been the subject of attention of philosophers since Antiquity, however, the doctrine of justice was the components of social and moral teachings in general, while traditionally the main issue for political philosophy was the question of power, its political organization and legitimacy. The purpose of the article is a scientific analysis of the political and philosophical legacy of John Rawls. Rawls dem-onstrated that the political organization of power is derived from how we understand ethical norms and what norms (rules) we are guided by in social interaction, therefore the main issue of political philosophy is not the question of power, but the question of justice. In addition, he was convinced that political freedom is closely re-lated to equality. The methodological basis included the dialectical method, a group of general scientific methods of cognition – the method of analysis and synthesis, the structural method, as well as private scientific ones - formal legal and comparative legal methods. It is concluded that Rawls’ theory of justice had a decisive influence on the political philosophy of the twentieth century, the development of which largely took place on the basis of criticism or reception of his ideas. Today we are witnessing the beginning of a break with the tradition of which Rawls is the spokesman and which assumes that the political is based on the possibility of consensus and ethical agreement. However, the current development of political philosophy is also closely related to the rethinking of Rawls’ legacy, which we see, in particular, in the development of so-called “imperfect” political theories.","PeriodicalId":183203,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues of the State and Law","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On John Rawls’ theory of justice\",\"authors\":\"Viktoriya V. Solovyeva\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-167-177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The political processes that took place in the world after the Second World War required a new philosophi-cal understanding, since the utilitarian approach, which dominated the Anglo-American political tradition for a long time, could not fully fulfill this task. John Rawls, from whom the revival of political philosophy began, proposed his own version of the solution of the accumulated theoretical problems, which met the social and po-litical demands of his time. Moreover, Rawls was practically the first to put justice at the center of political and philosophical thought. The problem of justice has been the subject of attention of philosophers since Antiquity, however, the doctrine of justice was the components of social and moral teachings in general, while traditionally the main issue for political philosophy was the question of power, its political organization and legitimacy. The purpose of the article is a scientific analysis of the political and philosophical legacy of John Rawls. Rawls dem-onstrated that the political organization of power is derived from how we understand ethical norms and what norms (rules) we are guided by in social interaction, therefore the main issue of political philosophy is not the question of power, but the question of justice. In addition, he was convinced that political freedom is closely re-lated to equality. The methodological basis included the dialectical method, a group of general scientific methods of cognition – the method of analysis and synthesis, the structural method, as well as private scientific ones - formal legal and comparative legal methods. It is concluded that Rawls’ theory of justice had a decisive influence on the political philosophy of the twentieth century, the development of which largely took place on the basis of criticism or reception of his ideas. Today we are witnessing the beginning of a break with the tradition of which Rawls is the spokesman and which assumes that the political is based on the possibility of consensus and ethical agreement. However, the current development of political philosophy is also closely related to the rethinking of Rawls’ legacy, which we see, in particular, in the development of so-called “imperfect” political theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues of the State and Law\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues of the State and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-167-177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues of the State and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2022-6-2-167-177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二次世界大战后世界上发生的政治进程需要一种新的哲学认识,长期以来主导英美政治传统的功利主义方法已不能完全完成这一任务。政治哲学的复兴始于约翰·罗尔斯,他提出了自己的解决积累的理论问题的版本,这符合他所处时代的社会和政治要求。此外,罗尔斯实际上是第一个将正义置于政治和哲学思想中心的人。自古代以来,正义问题一直是哲学家关注的主题,然而,正义学说是一般社会和道德教义的组成部分,而传统上政治哲学的主要问题是权力问题,其政治组织和合法性。本文的目的是对罗尔斯的政治和哲学遗产进行科学分析。罗尔斯论证了权力的政治组织源于我们如何理解伦理规范,以及我们在社会交往中受哪些规范(规则)的指导,因此政治哲学的主要问题不是权力问题,而是正义问题。此外,他深信政治自由与平等密切相关。方法论基础包括辩证法、一组一般科学的认识方法——分析综合方法、结构方法,以及私人科学的方法——形式法律方法和比较法律方法。最后得出的结论是,罗尔斯的正义理论对20世纪的政治哲学产生了决定性的影响,而政治哲学的发展主要是在对他的思想的批评或接受的基础上进行的。今天,我们正见证着与传统决裂的开始,罗尔斯是传统的代言人,传统假定政治是建立在共识和伦理协议的可能性之上的。然而,当前政治哲学的发展也与对罗尔斯遗产的重新思考密切相关,特别是在所谓“不完美”政治理论的发展中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On John Rawls’ theory of justice
The political processes that took place in the world after the Second World War required a new philosophi-cal understanding, since the utilitarian approach, which dominated the Anglo-American political tradition for a long time, could not fully fulfill this task. John Rawls, from whom the revival of political philosophy began, proposed his own version of the solution of the accumulated theoretical problems, which met the social and po-litical demands of his time. Moreover, Rawls was practically the first to put justice at the center of political and philosophical thought. The problem of justice has been the subject of attention of philosophers since Antiquity, however, the doctrine of justice was the components of social and moral teachings in general, while traditionally the main issue for political philosophy was the question of power, its political organization and legitimacy. The purpose of the article is a scientific analysis of the political and philosophical legacy of John Rawls. Rawls dem-onstrated that the political organization of power is derived from how we understand ethical norms and what norms (rules) we are guided by in social interaction, therefore the main issue of political philosophy is not the question of power, but the question of justice. In addition, he was convinced that political freedom is closely re-lated to equality. The methodological basis included the dialectical method, a group of general scientific methods of cognition – the method of analysis and synthesis, the structural method, as well as private scientific ones - formal legal and comparative legal methods. It is concluded that Rawls’ theory of justice had a decisive influence on the political philosophy of the twentieth century, the development of which largely took place on the basis of criticism or reception of his ideas. Today we are witnessing the beginning of a break with the tradition of which Rawls is the spokesman and which assumes that the political is based on the possibility of consensus and ethical agreement. However, the current development of political philosophy is also closely related to the rethinking of Rawls’ legacy, which we see, in particular, in the development of so-called “imperfect” political theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信