使用高影响实践的学生学习成果差异

L. Simons, Charlotte Marshall, Nancy Blank, Natalie Weaver
{"title":"使用高影响实践的学生学习成果差异","authors":"L. Simons, Charlotte Marshall, Nancy Blank, Natalie Weaver","doi":"10.15405/ejsbs.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares student learning outcomes for 1,500 students enrolled in psychology courses that utilize academicand cultural-based service-learning and experiential learning (i.e., internships) as primary pedagogical methods. A repeated measures analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey HSD analyses were conducted to measure differences in student learning outcomes from the beginning to the end of the semester for academic-based service-learners (ABSL), cultural-based service-learners (CBSL), and experiential learners (EL). There were significant Group x Time interaction effects. Experiential learners and academic-based service-learners increased their guilt and shame regarding their own Whiteness from the beginning to the end of semester compared to cultural-based service-learners. Cultural-based service-learners also increased their intercultural relationships, civic responsibility, interpersonal engagement, and understanding of diversity content by the end of the semester. ABSL, CBSL, and EL contribute to different student learning outcomes. The alignment between HIPs and student learning outcomes is discussed. © 2020 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk","PeriodicalId":164632,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Student Learning Outcomes that Utilize High Impact Practices\",\"authors\":\"L. Simons, Charlotte Marshall, Nancy Blank, Natalie Weaver\",\"doi\":\"10.15405/ejsbs.266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compares student learning outcomes for 1,500 students enrolled in psychology courses that utilize academicand cultural-based service-learning and experiential learning (i.e., internships) as primary pedagogical methods. A repeated measures analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey HSD analyses were conducted to measure differences in student learning outcomes from the beginning to the end of the semester for academic-based service-learners (ABSL), cultural-based service-learners (CBSL), and experiential learners (EL). There were significant Group x Time interaction effects. Experiential learners and academic-based service-learners increased their guilt and shame regarding their own Whiteness from the beginning to the end of semester compared to cultural-based service-learners. Cultural-based service-learners also increased their intercultural relationships, civic responsibility, interpersonal engagement, and understanding of diversity content by the end of the semester. ABSL, CBSL, and EL contribute to different student learning outcomes. The alignment between HIPs and student learning outcomes is discussed. © 2020 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk\",\"PeriodicalId\":164632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究比较了1500名参加心理学课程的学生的学习结果,这些课程采用基于学术和文化的服务学习和体验学习(即实习)作为主要的教学方法。采用事后Tukey HSD分析进行重复测量方差分析,以测量学术型服务学习者(ABSL)、文化型服务学习者(CBSL)和体验型学习者(EL)从学期开始到学期结束时学生学习成果的差异。组间交互作用显著。与文化型服务学习者相比,体验型和学术型服务学习者从学期开始到学期结束,对自己的白人身份的内疚感和羞耻感有所增加。以文化为基础的服务学习者在学期结束时也提高了他们的跨文化关系、公民责任、人际交往和对多样性内容的理解。ABSL, CBSL和EL有助于不同的学生学习成果。讨论了HIPs与学生学习成果之间的一致性。©2020由未来学院出版www.FutureAcademy.org.uk
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Student Learning Outcomes that Utilize High Impact Practices
This study compares student learning outcomes for 1,500 students enrolled in psychology courses that utilize academicand cultural-based service-learning and experiential learning (i.e., internships) as primary pedagogical methods. A repeated measures analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey HSD analyses were conducted to measure differences in student learning outcomes from the beginning to the end of the semester for academic-based service-learners (ABSL), cultural-based service-learners (CBSL), and experiential learners (EL). There were significant Group x Time interaction effects. Experiential learners and academic-based service-learners increased their guilt and shame regarding their own Whiteness from the beginning to the end of semester compared to cultural-based service-learners. Cultural-based service-learners also increased their intercultural relationships, civic responsibility, interpersonal engagement, and understanding of diversity content by the end of the semester. ABSL, CBSL, and EL contribute to different student learning outcomes. The alignment between HIPs and student learning outcomes is discussed. © 2020 Published by Future Academy www.FutureAcademy.org.uk
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信