Rumana Afroz Majumder, Amanul Islam, Md. Abdul Mannan, A. Chowdhury
{"title":"多西紫杉醇、顺铂、亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶与亚叶酸钙、5-氟尿嘧啶和顺铂作为头颈癌新辅助化疗后放化疗的比较","authors":"Rumana Afroz Majumder, Amanul Islam, Md. Abdul Mannan, A. Chowdhury","doi":"10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: HNSCC is the fifth most common cancer in the world and one of the most prevalent cancers in Bangladesh. Despite significant improvement in radiotherapy, the high incidence of loco-regional recurrences is a major challenge for radiation oncologists. This study was done to compare the response and toxicity of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil (TPLF) vs Leucovorin, 5- Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin (LFP) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiation with Cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer of squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out among 60 patients of locally advanced of head and neck cancer at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj from January 2015 to December 2015. In Arm-A, 30 patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on D1, Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, Leukovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750 mg/m2 on D1-D5 and in Arm B 30 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on D1, Leucovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750mg/m 2 on D1-D5 3 cycles with three weeks interval followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy in 33 fractions and weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 started on the first day of radiation. Results: Most of the patients were male and middle-aged group. In Arm-A, 21 patients (70%) showed complete response whereas in Arm-B regimen complete response was noticed in 16 patients (53.3%) which was statistically significant; however, partial responses were significantly more found in Arm-B. Regarding toxicity, with Arm-A patients experienced slightly more toxicities in comparison to Arm-B which was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: So, it could be concluded from this study that the therapeutic gain was better obtained in Arm-A compared to Arm-B in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.","PeriodicalId":193141,"journal":{"name":"SAS Journal of Medicine","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil versus Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Rumana Afroz Majumder, Amanul Islam, Md. Abdul Mannan, A. Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: HNSCC is the fifth most common cancer in the world and one of the most prevalent cancers in Bangladesh. Despite significant improvement in radiotherapy, the high incidence of loco-regional recurrences is a major challenge for radiation oncologists. This study was done to compare the response and toxicity of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil (TPLF) vs Leucovorin, 5- Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin (LFP) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiation with Cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer of squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out among 60 patients of locally advanced of head and neck cancer at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj from January 2015 to December 2015. In Arm-A, 30 patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on D1, Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, Leukovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750 mg/m2 on D1-D5 and in Arm B 30 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on D1, Leucovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750mg/m 2 on D1-D5 3 cycles with three weeks interval followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy in 33 fractions and weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 started on the first day of radiation. Results: Most of the patients were male and middle-aged group. In Arm-A, 21 patients (70%) showed complete response whereas in Arm-B regimen complete response was noticed in 16 patients (53.3%) which was statistically significant; however, partial responses were significantly more found in Arm-B. Regarding toxicity, with Arm-A patients experienced slightly more toxicities in comparison to Arm-B which was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: So, it could be concluded from this study that the therapeutic gain was better obtained in Arm-A compared to Arm-B in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil versus Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer
Background: HNSCC is the fifth most common cancer in the world and one of the most prevalent cancers in Bangladesh. Despite significant improvement in radiotherapy, the high incidence of loco-regional recurrences is a major challenge for radiation oncologists. This study was done to compare the response and toxicity of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Leucovorin and 5- Fluorouracil (TPLF) vs Leucovorin, 5- Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin (LFP) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemo-radiation with Cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer of squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out among 60 patients of locally advanced of head and neck cancer at Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj from January 2015 to December 2015. In Arm-A, 30 patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on D1, Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, Leukovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750 mg/m2 on D1-D5 and in Arm B 30 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on D1, Leucovorine 30 mg on D1-D3, 5-Flourouracil 750mg/m 2 on D1-D5 3 cycles with three weeks interval followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy in 33 fractions and weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 started on the first day of radiation. Results: Most of the patients were male and middle-aged group. In Arm-A, 21 patients (70%) showed complete response whereas in Arm-B regimen complete response was noticed in 16 patients (53.3%) which was statistically significant; however, partial responses were significantly more found in Arm-B. Regarding toxicity, with Arm-A patients experienced slightly more toxicities in comparison to Arm-B which was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: So, it could be concluded from this study that the therapeutic gain was better obtained in Arm-A compared to Arm-B in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.