环境影响评估(EIA)的有效性:孟加拉国视角

S. Shakil, Tazrina Habib Ananya
{"title":"环境影响评估(EIA)的有效性:孟加拉国视角","authors":"S. Shakil, Tazrina Habib Ananya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2381707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EIA as an environment management tool has been successful in terms of global awareness rising over the last four decades. Due to its rationalist approach it has been criticized about the inherent aim of influencing development decision and protecting the environment. Numerous researches have been performed to measure the 'effectiveness of EIA' which is still evolving as a domain. Four major criteria’s have been established till date. Effectiveness of Bangladesh EIA system has been explored with the help of those criteria’s. Procedural ineffectiveness seeks government measure in a couple areas mainly through institutional arrangement and capacity building. Substantive ineffectiveness reflects the global trend of failure to influence the development decision truly. Transactive effectiveness will be far reaching for a country like Bangladesh, depended on foreign aid largely. Normative effectiveness is still little known, but mass awareness about the environment through the debate regarding an ES report is a recent experience.","PeriodicalId":245576,"journal":{"name":"CSR & Management Practice eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Bangladesh Perspective\",\"authors\":\"S. Shakil, Tazrina Habib Ananya\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2381707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EIA as an environment management tool has been successful in terms of global awareness rising over the last four decades. Due to its rationalist approach it has been criticized about the inherent aim of influencing development decision and protecting the environment. Numerous researches have been performed to measure the 'effectiveness of EIA' which is still evolving as a domain. Four major criteria’s have been established till date. Effectiveness of Bangladesh EIA system has been explored with the help of those criteria’s. Procedural ineffectiveness seeks government measure in a couple areas mainly through institutional arrangement and capacity building. Substantive ineffectiveness reflects the global trend of failure to influence the development decision truly. Transactive effectiveness will be far reaching for a country like Bangladesh, depended on foreign aid largely. Normative effectiveness is still little known, but mass awareness about the environment through the debate regarding an ES report is a recent experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CSR & Management Practice eJournal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CSR & Management Practice eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSR & Management Practice eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在过去的四十年里,环境影响评估作为一种环境管理工具,在全球范围内取得了成功。由于其理性主义的方法,它在影响发展决策和保护环境的内在目的上受到了批评。已经进行了大量的研究来衡量“环境影响评估的有效性”,这仍然是一个不断发展的领域。迄今为止,已经确立了四个主要标准。在这些标准的帮助下,对孟加拉国环境影响评价系统的有效性进行了探讨。程序性无效性主要通过制度安排和能力建设两方面寻求政府对策。实质性无效反映了未能真正影响发展决策的全球趋势。对于像孟加拉国这样主要依赖外国援助的国家来说,互动的有效性将是深远的。规范的有效性仍然鲜为人知,但通过关于ES报告的辩论,大众对环境的认识是最近的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Bangladesh Perspective
EIA as an environment management tool has been successful in terms of global awareness rising over the last four decades. Due to its rationalist approach it has been criticized about the inherent aim of influencing development decision and protecting the environment. Numerous researches have been performed to measure the 'effectiveness of EIA' which is still evolving as a domain. Four major criteria’s have been established till date. Effectiveness of Bangladesh EIA system has been explored with the help of those criteria’s. Procedural ineffectiveness seeks government measure in a couple areas mainly through institutional arrangement and capacity building. Substantive ineffectiveness reflects the global trend of failure to influence the development decision truly. Transactive effectiveness will be far reaching for a country like Bangladesh, depended on foreign aid largely. Normative effectiveness is still little known, but mass awareness about the environment through the debate regarding an ES report is a recent experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信