用OPC UA放松良心:对不安全部署的全互联网研究

M. Dahlmanns, J. Lohmöller, I. Fink, J. Pennekamp, Klaus Wehrle, Martin Henze
{"title":"用OPC UA放松良心:对不安全部署的全互联网研究","authors":"M. Dahlmanns, J. Lohmöller, I. Fink, J. Pennekamp, Klaus Wehrle, Martin Henze","doi":"10.1145/3419394.3423666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to increasing digitalization, formerly isolated industrial networks, e.g., for factory and process automation, move closer and closer to the Internet, mandating secure communication. However, securely setting up OPC UA, the prime candidate for secure industrial communication, is challenging due to a large variety of insecure options. To study whether Internet-facing OPC UA appliances are configured securely, we actively scan the IPv4 address space for publicly reachable OPC UA systems and assess the security of their configurations. We observe problematic security configurations such as missing access control (on 24% of hosts), disabled security functionality (24%), or use of deprecated cryptographic primitives (25%) on in total 92% of the reachable deployments. Furthermore, we discover several hundred devices in multiple autonomous systems sharing the same security certificate, opening the door for impersonation attacks. Overall, in this paper, we highlight commonly found security misconfigurations and underline the importance of appropriate configuration for security-featuring protocols.","PeriodicalId":255324,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Easing the Conscience with OPC UA: An Internet-Wide Study on Insecure Deployments\",\"authors\":\"M. Dahlmanns, J. Lohmöller, I. Fink, J. Pennekamp, Klaus Wehrle, Martin Henze\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3419394.3423666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to increasing digitalization, formerly isolated industrial networks, e.g., for factory and process automation, move closer and closer to the Internet, mandating secure communication. However, securely setting up OPC UA, the prime candidate for secure industrial communication, is challenging due to a large variety of insecure options. To study whether Internet-facing OPC UA appliances are configured securely, we actively scan the IPv4 address space for publicly reachable OPC UA systems and assess the security of their configurations. We observe problematic security configurations such as missing access control (on 24% of hosts), disabled security functionality (24%), or use of deprecated cryptographic primitives (25%) on in total 92% of the reachable deployments. Furthermore, we discover several hundred devices in multiple autonomous systems sharing the same security certificate, opening the door for impersonation attacks. Overall, in this paper, we highlight commonly found security misconfigurations and underline the importance of appropriate configuration for security-featuring protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

由于数字化程度的提高,以前孤立的工业网络,例如工厂和过程自动化,越来越接近互联网,要求安全通信。然而,由于各种不安全的选项,安全设置OPC UA(安全工业通信的主要候选)是具有挑战性的。为了研究面向互联网的OPC UA设备是否配置安全,我们主动扫描IPv4地址空间,以获取可公开访问的OPC UA系统,并评估其配置的安全性。我们在总共92%的可达部署中观察到有问题的安全配置,例如缺少访问控制(24%的主机)、禁用安全功能(24%)或使用不推荐的加密原语(25%)。此外,我们发现多个自治系统中的数百个设备共享相同的安全证书,为冒充攻击打开了大门。总之,在本文中,我们强调了常见的安全错误配置,并强调了对具有安全特性的协议进行适当配置的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Easing the Conscience with OPC UA: An Internet-Wide Study on Insecure Deployments
Due to increasing digitalization, formerly isolated industrial networks, e.g., for factory and process automation, move closer and closer to the Internet, mandating secure communication. However, securely setting up OPC UA, the prime candidate for secure industrial communication, is challenging due to a large variety of insecure options. To study whether Internet-facing OPC UA appliances are configured securely, we actively scan the IPv4 address space for publicly reachable OPC UA systems and assess the security of their configurations. We observe problematic security configurations such as missing access control (on 24% of hosts), disabled security functionality (24%), or use of deprecated cryptographic primitives (25%) on in total 92% of the reachable deployments. Furthermore, we discover several hundred devices in multiple autonomous systems sharing the same security certificate, opening the door for impersonation attacks. Overall, in this paper, we highlight commonly found security misconfigurations and underline the importance of appropriate configuration for security-featuring protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信