评估半职业足球运动员的不对称性并预测其表现

Jorge Arede, John F. T. Fernandes, Harjiv Singh, C. Bishop, D. Romero-Rodriguez, Marc Madruga Parera
{"title":"评估半职业足球运动员的不对称性并预测其表现","authors":"Jorge Arede, John F. T. Fernandes, Harjiv Singh, C. Bishop, D. Romero-Rodriguez, Marc Madruga Parera","doi":"10.1177/17479541221146220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to (a) detail the interlimb asymmetries during multi-directional jumping, change of direction and for ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and (b) determine how asymmetries and performance in multi-directional jumping and ankle dorsiflexion predict performance during change of direction tests. Twenty-two male semi-professional players completed a testing session which consisted of unilateral ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, vertical and horizontal unilateral and lateral countermovement jumps and left and right leg 90° (COD90L&R) and 180° (COD180L&R) change of direction tests. No significant differences between limbs were observed for any of the variables ( P > 0.05), though vertical countermovement jump (11.1% ± 9.1%) and dorsiflexion range of motion (10.5% ± 10.3%) imbalances were greater than those during lateral (2.7% ± 2.2%) and horizontal (2.2% ± 1.9%) countermovement jumps, and 90° (3.6% ± 3.1%) and 180° change of direction (2.9% ± 3.6%). Subjects presented 3.4 ± 1.4 real asymmetries (i.e., one greater than the coefficient of variation) across the tests, with all subjects having at least one real asymmetry. Stepwise linear regression models explained a reasonable amount of variance in change of direction180R (70%), COD90L (57%), COD90R (39%), COD180L (23%) using the countermovement jump and dorsiflexion range of motion variables ( P < 0.05). The current findings indicate that semi-professional soccer players have real bilateral asymmetries (particularly in countermovement jump and dorsiflexion range of motion), which practitioners should be cognizant of. Given the prediction value, change of direction performance can be predicted using performance and asymmetries during multi-directional jumping and ankle dorsiflexion.","PeriodicalId":182483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing asymmetries and predicting performance in semiprofessional soccer players\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Arede, John F. T. Fernandes, Harjiv Singh, C. Bishop, D. Romero-Rodriguez, Marc Madruga Parera\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17479541221146220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to (a) detail the interlimb asymmetries during multi-directional jumping, change of direction and for ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and (b) determine how asymmetries and performance in multi-directional jumping and ankle dorsiflexion predict performance during change of direction tests. Twenty-two male semi-professional players completed a testing session which consisted of unilateral ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, vertical and horizontal unilateral and lateral countermovement jumps and left and right leg 90° (COD90L&R) and 180° (COD180L&R) change of direction tests. No significant differences between limbs were observed for any of the variables ( P > 0.05), though vertical countermovement jump (11.1% ± 9.1%) and dorsiflexion range of motion (10.5% ± 10.3%) imbalances were greater than those during lateral (2.7% ± 2.2%) and horizontal (2.2% ± 1.9%) countermovement jumps, and 90° (3.6% ± 3.1%) and 180° change of direction (2.9% ± 3.6%). Subjects presented 3.4 ± 1.4 real asymmetries (i.e., one greater than the coefficient of variation) across the tests, with all subjects having at least one real asymmetry. Stepwise linear regression models explained a reasonable amount of variance in change of direction180R (70%), COD90L (57%), COD90R (39%), COD180L (23%) using the countermovement jump and dorsiflexion range of motion variables ( P < 0.05). The current findings indicate that semi-professional soccer players have real bilateral asymmetries (particularly in countermovement jump and dorsiflexion range of motion), which practitioners should be cognizant of. Given the prediction value, change of direction performance can be predicted using performance and asymmetries during multi-directional jumping and ankle dorsiflexion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":182483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221146220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221146220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在(a)详细描述多向跳跃、方向改变和踝关节背屈运动范围时的肢间不对称;(b)确定多向跳跃和踝关节背屈时的不对称和表现如何预测方向改变测试中的表现。22名男性半职业运动员完成了单侧踝关节背屈运动范围、垂直和水平单侧和横向反动作跳跃、左右腿90°(COD90L&R)和180°(COD180L&R)方向变化测试。四肢间各变量均无显著差异(P > 0.05),但垂直反跳(11.1%±9.1%)和背屈运动范围(10.5%±10.3%)失衡大于横向(2.7%±2.2%)和水平(2.2%±1.9%)反跳以及90°(3.6%±3.1%)和180°方向变化(2.9%±3.6%)时的失衡。受试者在整个测试中呈现3.4±1.4个真实不对称(即比变异系数大一个),所有受试者至少有一个真实不对称。逐步线性回归模型利用运动变量的反动作跳跃和背屈曲范围解释了方向变化的方差(70%)、COD90L(57%)、COD90R(39%)、COD180L(23%)的合理方差(P < 0.05)。目前的研究结果表明,半职业足球运动员有真正的双边不对称(特别是在反动作跳跃和背屈运动范围),从业者应该认识到这一点。给定预测值,可以利用多向跳跃和踝关节背屈时的表现和不对称性来预测方向表现的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing asymmetries and predicting performance in semiprofessional soccer players
This study aimed to (a) detail the interlimb asymmetries during multi-directional jumping, change of direction and for ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and (b) determine how asymmetries and performance in multi-directional jumping and ankle dorsiflexion predict performance during change of direction tests. Twenty-two male semi-professional players completed a testing session which consisted of unilateral ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, vertical and horizontal unilateral and lateral countermovement jumps and left and right leg 90° (COD90L&R) and 180° (COD180L&R) change of direction tests. No significant differences between limbs were observed for any of the variables ( P > 0.05), though vertical countermovement jump (11.1% ± 9.1%) and dorsiflexion range of motion (10.5% ± 10.3%) imbalances were greater than those during lateral (2.7% ± 2.2%) and horizontal (2.2% ± 1.9%) countermovement jumps, and 90° (3.6% ± 3.1%) and 180° change of direction (2.9% ± 3.6%). Subjects presented 3.4 ± 1.4 real asymmetries (i.e., one greater than the coefficient of variation) across the tests, with all subjects having at least one real asymmetry. Stepwise linear regression models explained a reasonable amount of variance in change of direction180R (70%), COD90L (57%), COD90R (39%), COD180L (23%) using the countermovement jump and dorsiflexion range of motion variables ( P < 0.05). The current findings indicate that semi-professional soccer players have real bilateral asymmetries (particularly in countermovement jump and dorsiflexion range of motion), which practitioners should be cognizant of. Given the prediction value, change of direction performance can be predicted using performance and asymmetries during multi-directional jumping and ankle dorsiflexion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信