运动表现受损时抗感觉性药物效果的评估

John L. Plummer, Patricia L. Cmielewski, Geoffrey K. Gourlay, Harry Owen, Michael J. Cousins
{"title":"运动表现受损时抗感觉性药物效果的评估","authors":"John L. Plummer,&nbsp;Patricia L. Cmielewski,&nbsp;Geoffrey K. Gourlay,&nbsp;Harry Owen,&nbsp;Michael J. Cousins","doi":"10.1016/0160-5402(91)90057-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hot-plate (HP) and tail-flick (TF) tests are widely used to assess analgesic activity of drugs. These tests do not directly measure the intensity of the noxious stimulus perceived by the animal, but only the animal's response to it, and so may be affected by non-analgesic drugs. Sedatives and muscle relaxants, for example, may impair the ability to respond and hence be wrongly considered to have analgesic activity. We examined response of rats in the HP (55°C, cutoff time 25 sec) and TF (cutoff time 5 sec) tests following administration of pentobarbitone, diazepam or pancuronium. These drugs all impaired motor performance as assessed by reduction in mean rotarod performance times to 6–32% of predrug values. However, HP and TF latencies were not appreciably prolonged. We also found that pancuronium did not alter effects of morphine on HP or TF latencies, despite reduction in rotarod performance to 38% of predrug values. Our results support the validity of HP and TF tests as analgesic assays even in the presence of substantial impairment of motor performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological methods","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-5402(91)90057-C","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of antinociceptive drug effects in the presence of impaired motor performance\",\"authors\":\"John L. Plummer,&nbsp;Patricia L. Cmielewski,&nbsp;Geoffrey K. Gourlay,&nbsp;Harry Owen,&nbsp;Michael J. Cousins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0160-5402(91)90057-C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The hot-plate (HP) and tail-flick (TF) tests are widely used to assess analgesic activity of drugs. These tests do not directly measure the intensity of the noxious stimulus perceived by the animal, but only the animal's response to it, and so may be affected by non-analgesic drugs. Sedatives and muscle relaxants, for example, may impair the ability to respond and hence be wrongly considered to have analgesic activity. We examined response of rats in the HP (55°C, cutoff time 25 sec) and TF (cutoff time 5 sec) tests following administration of pentobarbitone, diazepam or pancuronium. These drugs all impaired motor performance as assessed by reduction in mean rotarod performance times to 6–32% of predrug values. However, HP and TF latencies were not appreciably prolonged. We also found that pancuronium did not alter effects of morphine on HP or TF latencies, despite reduction in rotarod performance to 38% of predrug values. Our results support the validity of HP and TF tests as analgesic assays even in the presence of substantial impairment of motor performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacological methods\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 79-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-5402(91)90057-C\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016054029190057C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016054029190057C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

热板试验(HP)和甩尾试验(TF)被广泛用于评价药物的镇痛活性。这些测试并不直接测量动物感知到的有害刺激的强度,而只是动物对它的反应,因此可能受到非镇痛药物的影响。例如,镇静剂和肌肉松弛剂可能损害反应能力,因此被错误地认为具有镇痛作用。我们检测了大鼠给药戊巴比酮、地西泮或泮库溴铵后HP(55°C,截止时间25秒)和TF(截止时间5秒)的反应。这些药物都损害了运动表现,通过将平均旋转时间减少到药物前值的6-32%来评估。然而,HP和TF延迟没有明显延长。我们还发现,泮库溴铵并没有改变吗啡对HP或TF潜伏期的影响,尽管它使旋流器的性能降低到药物前值的38%。我们的研究结果支持HP和TF测试作为镇痛试验的有效性,即使在存在严重的运动功能障碍的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of antinociceptive drug effects in the presence of impaired motor performance

The hot-plate (HP) and tail-flick (TF) tests are widely used to assess analgesic activity of drugs. These tests do not directly measure the intensity of the noxious stimulus perceived by the animal, but only the animal's response to it, and so may be affected by non-analgesic drugs. Sedatives and muscle relaxants, for example, may impair the ability to respond and hence be wrongly considered to have analgesic activity. We examined response of rats in the HP (55°C, cutoff time 25 sec) and TF (cutoff time 5 sec) tests following administration of pentobarbitone, diazepam or pancuronium. These drugs all impaired motor performance as assessed by reduction in mean rotarod performance times to 6–32% of predrug values. However, HP and TF latencies were not appreciably prolonged. We also found that pancuronium did not alter effects of morphine on HP or TF latencies, despite reduction in rotarod performance to 38% of predrug values. Our results support the validity of HP and TF tests as analgesic assays even in the presence of substantial impairment of motor performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信