砂岩孔隙尺度固粒水泥溶蚀及其对CO2注入的影响

O. Shahrokhi, A. Jahanbakhsh, S. Ghanaatian, M. Maroto-Valer
{"title":"砂岩孔隙尺度固粒水泥溶蚀及其对CO2注入的影响","authors":"O. Shahrokhi, A. Jahanbakhsh, S. Ghanaatian, M. Maroto-Valer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3820534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CO2 geological storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs and saline aquifers is currently one of the most economical methods to mitigate CO2 emissions, mainly because of available geological data from oil and gas exploration and production in the last decades as well as abandoned wellbore facilities. Four main factors dictate the safe and economical CO2 storage and selection of a suitable storage site: while wellbore and cap rock integrity are critical to the security of stored CO2, storage capacity and CO2 injectivity are among the main factors driving the cost of storage per ton of CO2. Low or reduced CO2 injectivity at injection wellbore can significantly increase the compression costs of the project. In worst-case scenarios, a blockage can increase injection pressures above rock fracture pressure, thus critically jeopardising further injection in the same well. \n \nThe global abundance, high storage capacity and potentially low chemical reactivity of sandstone reservoirs make them great candidates for CO2 geological storage sites. The matrix of siliciclastic rocks is mainly made of quartz grains, and there is negligible chemical reactivity in contact with carbonic acid formed during the injection. However, the most common cementing agents in these rocks (e.g. calcite, dolomite and, to some extent, clays) react with carbonic acid. These reactions lead to mechanisms like cement dissolution, mineral deposition, and sand fine migration (sand mobilisation). Depending on the volumetric percentage of the binding cement, its geometrical distribution within the matrix and pore (and throat) size distribution of the rock, fine migration and binding cement dissolution can enhance or impair CO2 injectivity [1,2]. Despite numerous studies regarding the effect of CO2 injection on fine migration and injectivity, there is still no consensus regarding the impact of intergranular cement dissolution on CO2 injectivity. \n \nIn this study, we have focused on the effect of binding cement dissolution on pore morphology in a typical sandstone (Berea) and demonstrating how the observations of CO2 injectivity change at the core scale alone could be misleading and explain some apparent discrepancies reported in the literature. We cut three slices of this core for X-ray micro-computed tomography (MicroCT) imaging. The first slice was cut from the original clean core. After performing a coreflood experiment with carbonated water through the rest of the core, two other pieces were cut from the inlet and outlet of the core. To represent the extreme dissolution conditions (lowest pH) during CO2 injection, a batch of North Sea brine fully saturated with CO2 was prepared and injected through the core at typical reservoir conditions (50°C and 2.6×107 Pa). \n \nThree 3D models are reconstructed from images of the prepared rock slices to represent the pore structure of the rock before injection and the inlet and outlet of the core subjected to CW injection. Avizo (a commercial software) is used to calculate the permeability and velocity fields in these models. The comparison of results from micro-CT imaging and the coreflood experiment shows how single-scale studies (either core or pore-scale) of CO2 injectivity can lead to a misleading conclusion about the effect of fine migration on permeability at larger scales.","PeriodicalId":135089,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Carbon Reduction (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pore-Scale Grain-Binding Cement Dissolution in Sandstone Rocks and its Effect on CO2 Injectivity\",\"authors\":\"O. Shahrokhi, A. Jahanbakhsh, S. Ghanaatian, M. Maroto-Valer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3820534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CO2 geological storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs and saline aquifers is currently one of the most economical methods to mitigate CO2 emissions, mainly because of available geological data from oil and gas exploration and production in the last decades as well as abandoned wellbore facilities. Four main factors dictate the safe and economical CO2 storage and selection of a suitable storage site: while wellbore and cap rock integrity are critical to the security of stored CO2, storage capacity and CO2 injectivity are among the main factors driving the cost of storage per ton of CO2. Low or reduced CO2 injectivity at injection wellbore can significantly increase the compression costs of the project. In worst-case scenarios, a blockage can increase injection pressures above rock fracture pressure, thus critically jeopardising further injection in the same well. \\n \\nThe global abundance, high storage capacity and potentially low chemical reactivity of sandstone reservoirs make them great candidates for CO2 geological storage sites. The matrix of siliciclastic rocks is mainly made of quartz grains, and there is negligible chemical reactivity in contact with carbonic acid formed during the injection. However, the most common cementing agents in these rocks (e.g. calcite, dolomite and, to some extent, clays) react with carbonic acid. These reactions lead to mechanisms like cement dissolution, mineral deposition, and sand fine migration (sand mobilisation). Depending on the volumetric percentage of the binding cement, its geometrical distribution within the matrix and pore (and throat) size distribution of the rock, fine migration and binding cement dissolution can enhance or impair CO2 injectivity [1,2]. Despite numerous studies regarding the effect of CO2 injection on fine migration and injectivity, there is still no consensus regarding the impact of intergranular cement dissolution on CO2 injectivity. \\n \\nIn this study, we have focused on the effect of binding cement dissolution on pore morphology in a typical sandstone (Berea) and demonstrating how the observations of CO2 injectivity change at the core scale alone could be misleading and explain some apparent discrepancies reported in the literature. We cut three slices of this core for X-ray micro-computed tomography (MicroCT) imaging. The first slice was cut from the original clean core. After performing a coreflood experiment with carbonated water through the rest of the core, two other pieces were cut from the inlet and outlet of the core. To represent the extreme dissolution conditions (lowest pH) during CO2 injection, a batch of North Sea brine fully saturated with CO2 was prepared and injected through the core at typical reservoir conditions (50°C and 2.6×107 Pa). \\n \\nThree 3D models are reconstructed from images of the prepared rock slices to represent the pore structure of the rock before injection and the inlet and outlet of the core subjected to CW injection. Avizo (a commercial software) is used to calculate the permeability and velocity fields in these models. The comparison of results from micro-CT imaging and the coreflood experiment shows how single-scale studies (either core or pore-scale) of CO2 injectivity can lead to a misleading conclusion about the effect of fine migration on permeability at larger scales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Carbon Reduction (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Carbon Reduction (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Carbon Reduction (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在枯竭的油气储层和含盐含水层中进行二氧化碳地质储存是目前减少二氧化碳排放最经济的方法之一,主要是因为过去几十年油气勘探和生产的可用地质数据以及废弃的井筒设施。四个主要因素决定了CO2的安全、经济储存和合适储存地点的选择:井筒和盖层的完整性对储存CO2的安全性至关重要,而储存容量和CO2注入能力是决定每吨CO2储存成本的主要因素。注井处CO2注入能力低或降低会显著增加项目的压缩成本。在最坏的情况下,堵塞会使注入压力高于岩石破裂压力,从而严重危及同一口井的进一步注入。砂岩储层的全球丰度、高储存量和潜在的低化学反应性使其成为二氧化碳地质储存场所的理想候选者。硅屑岩基质主要由石英颗粒构成,与注入过程中形成的碳酸接触,化学反应性可忽略不计。然而,这些岩石中最常见的胶结剂(如方解石、白云石和某种程度上的粘土)与碳酸反应。这些反应导致了水泥溶解、矿物沉积和细砂迁移(砂动员)等机制。根据胶结水泥浆的体积百分比、其在基质内的几何分布以及岩石的孔(喉)尺寸分布、细运移和胶结水泥浆的溶解,可以增强或削弱CO2注入能力[1,2]。尽管大量研究表明注入CO2对细运移和注入能力的影响,但对于颗粒间水泥溶解对CO2注入能力的影响仍未达成共识。在本研究中,我们重点研究了胶结水泥浆溶解对典型砂岩(Berea)孔隙形态的影响,并证明了仅在岩心尺度上观察到的二氧化碳注入率变化可能会产生误导,并解释了文献中报道的一些明显差异。我们切下三片该核心用于x射线微计算机断层扫描(MicroCT)成像。第一片是从原始的干净的核上切下来的。在用碳酸水通过岩心的其余部分进行岩心注水实验后,从岩心的入口和出口切割另外两块。为了模拟注入CO2时的极端溶解条件(最低pH值),制备了一批完全饱和CO2的北海盐水,并在典型储层条件(50°C, 2.6×107 Pa)下通过岩心注入。利用制备的岩片图像重建3个三维模型,分别表示注入前岩石的孔隙结构和连续注入后岩心的入口和出口。利用商用软件Avizo计算了这些模型中的渗透率场和速度场。显微ct成像结果与岩心驱油实验结果的对比表明,单尺度(岩心或孔隙尺度)的二氧化碳注入率研究可能导致在更大尺度上细运移对渗透率影响的误导性结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pore-Scale Grain-Binding Cement Dissolution in Sandstone Rocks and its Effect on CO2 Injectivity
CO2 geological storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs and saline aquifers is currently one of the most economical methods to mitigate CO2 emissions, mainly because of available geological data from oil and gas exploration and production in the last decades as well as abandoned wellbore facilities. Four main factors dictate the safe and economical CO2 storage and selection of a suitable storage site: while wellbore and cap rock integrity are critical to the security of stored CO2, storage capacity and CO2 injectivity are among the main factors driving the cost of storage per ton of CO2. Low or reduced CO2 injectivity at injection wellbore can significantly increase the compression costs of the project. In worst-case scenarios, a blockage can increase injection pressures above rock fracture pressure, thus critically jeopardising further injection in the same well. The global abundance, high storage capacity and potentially low chemical reactivity of sandstone reservoirs make them great candidates for CO2 geological storage sites. The matrix of siliciclastic rocks is mainly made of quartz grains, and there is negligible chemical reactivity in contact with carbonic acid formed during the injection. However, the most common cementing agents in these rocks (e.g. calcite, dolomite and, to some extent, clays) react with carbonic acid. These reactions lead to mechanisms like cement dissolution, mineral deposition, and sand fine migration (sand mobilisation). Depending on the volumetric percentage of the binding cement, its geometrical distribution within the matrix and pore (and throat) size distribution of the rock, fine migration and binding cement dissolution can enhance or impair CO2 injectivity [1,2]. Despite numerous studies regarding the effect of CO2 injection on fine migration and injectivity, there is still no consensus regarding the impact of intergranular cement dissolution on CO2 injectivity. In this study, we have focused on the effect of binding cement dissolution on pore morphology in a typical sandstone (Berea) and demonstrating how the observations of CO2 injectivity change at the core scale alone could be misleading and explain some apparent discrepancies reported in the literature. We cut three slices of this core for X-ray micro-computed tomography (MicroCT) imaging. The first slice was cut from the original clean core. After performing a coreflood experiment with carbonated water through the rest of the core, two other pieces were cut from the inlet and outlet of the core. To represent the extreme dissolution conditions (lowest pH) during CO2 injection, a batch of North Sea brine fully saturated with CO2 was prepared and injected through the core at typical reservoir conditions (50°C and 2.6×107 Pa). Three 3D models are reconstructed from images of the prepared rock slices to represent the pore structure of the rock before injection and the inlet and outlet of the core subjected to CW injection. Avizo (a commercial software) is used to calculate the permeability and velocity fields in these models. The comparison of results from micro-CT imaging and the coreflood experiment shows how single-scale studies (either core or pore-scale) of CO2 injectivity can lead to a misleading conclusion about the effect of fine migration on permeability at larger scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信