全球虚拟团队协同技术研究:解释性视角下的实证研究

T. Clear
{"title":"全球虚拟团队协同技术研究:解释性视角下的实证研究","authors":"T. Clear","doi":"10.1109/ICGSE.2009.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researching global software engineering teams (GSETs), presents several phenomena of interest, and raises several issues relating to choice of method. Given the important function of both time and space when studying GSETs in field settings, ‘snapshot’ research methods (such as the use of questionnaires, and even interviews), tend to fall short in capturing some of the innate complexities. Researchers from the Information Systems discipline have recommended the use of such research methods as qualitative case studies and action research, but for software engineering researchers such methods appear uncommon. Action Research in particular, where the researcher is an active participant and even change agent challenges the notion of ‘objective’ science. This paper focuses on the design and conduct of empirical software engineering research from an interpretive viewpoint, and demonstrates its application to theory development in field studies within global virtual team contexts. The paper argues for a wider set of perspectives and an extension of the repertoire for researching the complex, dynamic and essentially human phenomena represented by GSETs.","PeriodicalId":137777,"journal":{"name":"2009 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Researching Collaborative Technologies in Global Virtual Teams: Empirical Studies from an Interpretive Perspective\",\"authors\":\"T. Clear\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGSE.2009.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researching global software engineering teams (GSETs), presents several phenomena of interest, and raises several issues relating to choice of method. Given the important function of both time and space when studying GSETs in field settings, ‘snapshot’ research methods (such as the use of questionnaires, and even interviews), tend to fall short in capturing some of the innate complexities. Researchers from the Information Systems discipline have recommended the use of such research methods as qualitative case studies and action research, but for software engineering researchers such methods appear uncommon. Action Research in particular, where the researcher is an active participant and even change agent challenges the notion of ‘objective’ science. This paper focuses on the design and conduct of empirical software engineering research from an interpretive viewpoint, and demonstrates its application to theory development in field studies within global virtual team contexts. The paper argues for a wider set of perspectives and an extension of the repertoire for researching the complex, dynamic and essentially human phenomena represented by GSETs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2009.56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGSE.2009.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究全球软件工程团队(GSETs),提出了一些有趣的现象,并提出了一些与方法选择有关的问题。在实地研究gset时,考虑到时间和空间的重要作用,“快照”研究方法(如使用问卷调查,甚至访谈)往往无法捕捉到一些内在的复杂性。来自信息系统学科的研究人员推荐使用定性案例研究和行动研究等研究方法,但对于软件工程研究人员来说,这些方法似乎并不常见。特别是行动研究,研究人员是一个积极的参与者,甚至是变革的推动者,挑战了“客观”科学的概念。本文从解释性的角度探讨了实证软件工程研究的设计与实施,并展示了其在全球虚拟团队背景下实地研究理论发展中的应用。本文提出了一种更广泛的观点,并扩展了研究gset所代表的复杂、动态和本质上是人类现象的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Researching Collaborative Technologies in Global Virtual Teams: Empirical Studies from an Interpretive Perspective
Researching global software engineering teams (GSETs), presents several phenomena of interest, and raises several issues relating to choice of method. Given the important function of both time and space when studying GSETs in field settings, ‘snapshot’ research methods (such as the use of questionnaires, and even interviews), tend to fall short in capturing some of the innate complexities. Researchers from the Information Systems discipline have recommended the use of such research methods as qualitative case studies and action research, but for software engineering researchers such methods appear uncommon. Action Research in particular, where the researcher is an active participant and even change agent challenges the notion of ‘objective’ science. This paper focuses on the design and conduct of empirical software engineering research from an interpretive viewpoint, and demonstrates its application to theory development in field studies within global virtual team contexts. The paper argues for a wider set of perspectives and an extension of the repertoire for researching the complex, dynamic and essentially human phenomena represented by GSETs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信