缓解电力网络级联故障的互惠利他行为体

P. Hines, S. Talukdar
{"title":"缓解电力网络级联故障的互惠利他行为体","authors":"P. Hines, S. Talukdar","doi":"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cascading failures in electrical power networks often come with disastrous consequences. A variety of schemes for mitigating cascading failures exist, but the vast majority depend upon centralized control architectures. Centralized designs are frequently more susceptible to communications latency and bandwidth limitations and can be vulnerable to random failures and directed attacks. This paper proposes a decentralized approach. We place control agents at each substation in a power network, each of which uses decentralized model predictive control to select emergency control actions. When making decisions the control agents consider not only their own goals, but also the goals of nearby agents. Thus the agents act with reciprocal altruism. Results from simulations of extreme cascading failures within the IEEE 300 bus test network indicate that this approach can dramatically reduce the average size and social cost of large cascading failures. Simulations also show that the bandwidth required for message passing is well within the limits of current technology.","PeriodicalId":207041,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reciprocally altruistic agents for the mitigation of cascading failures in electrical power networks\",\"authors\":\"P. Hines, S. Talukdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cascading failures in electrical power networks often come with disastrous consequences. A variety of schemes for mitigating cascading failures exist, but the vast majority depend upon centralized control architectures. Centralized designs are frequently more susceptible to communications latency and bandwidth limitations and can be vulnerable to random failures and directed attacks. This paper proposes a decentralized approach. We place control agents at each substation in a power network, each of which uses decentralized model predictive control to select emergency control actions. When making decisions the control agents consider not only their own goals, but also the goals of nearby agents. Thus the agents act with reciprocal altruism. Results from simulations of extreme cascading failures within the IEEE 300 bus test network indicate that this approach can dramatically reduce the average size and social cost of large cascading failures. Simulations also show that the bandwidth required for message passing is well within the limits of current technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

电力网络中的级联故障通常会带来灾难性的后果。存在各种减轻级联故障的方案,但绝大多数依赖于集中控制体系结构。集中式设计通常更容易受到通信延迟和带宽限制的影响,并且容易受到随机故障和定向攻击的影响。本文提出了一种分散的方法。我们在电网中的每个变电站放置控制代理,每个控制代理使用分散模型预测控制来选择紧急控制动作。控制智能体在做决策时不仅要考虑自己的目标,还要考虑附近智能体的目标。因此,代理人以互惠利他主义行事。IEEE 300总线测试网络中极端级联故障的仿真结果表明,该方法可以显著降低大型级联故障的平均规模和社会成本。仿真还表明,消息传递所需的带宽完全在当前技术的限制之内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reciprocally altruistic agents for the mitigation of cascading failures in electrical power networks
Cascading failures in electrical power networks often come with disastrous consequences. A variety of schemes for mitigating cascading failures exist, but the vast majority depend upon centralized control architectures. Centralized designs are frequently more susceptible to communications latency and bandwidth limitations and can be vulnerable to random failures and directed attacks. This paper proposes a decentralized approach. We place control agents at each substation in a power network, each of which uses decentralized model predictive control to select emergency control actions. When making decisions the control agents consider not only their own goals, but also the goals of nearby agents. Thus the agents act with reciprocal altruism. Results from simulations of extreme cascading failures within the IEEE 300 bus test network indicate that this approach can dramatically reduce the average size and social cost of large cascading failures. Simulations also show that the bandwidth required for message passing is well within the limits of current technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信