治疗指征影响治疗范围内的时间

H. Iner
{"title":"治疗指征影响治疗范围内的时间","authors":"H. Iner","doi":"10.5606/e-cvsi.2022.1392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the treatment in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) who were treated with warfarin for different indications. Patients and methods: A total of 536 patients (314 males, 222 females; mean age: 55.6±10.8 years; range, 18 to 89 years) were retrospectively reviewed between January 2016 and January 2020. The patients were evaluated in two groups: 273 DVT patients (149 males, 124 females; mean age: 56.7±11.3 years) who received long-term therapy (six months) and 263 mechanical MVR patients (165 males, 98 females; mean age: 56.2±9.4 years). Both groups were compared in terms of the percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR), the time to reach the target international normalized ratio (INR), and warfarin related complications. Results: The number of total hospital visits and total INR measurements for six months in the MVR group was statistically significantly higher than in the DVT group (p<0.001). The duration and percentage of TTR in the first three and six months of the MVR group were statistically significantly higher than the DVT group (p<0.05). Conclusion: More MVR patients remained in the therapeutic range than DVT patients due to the frequent hospital visits of these patients for various reasons; thus, it may be beneficial to increase the frequency of follow-up examinations or measurements of INR in patients who have started warfarin treatment for an indication other than valve replacement.","PeriodicalId":229686,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The treatment indication affects the time in therapeutic range\",\"authors\":\"H. Iner\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/e-cvsi.2022.1392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the treatment in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) who were treated with warfarin for different indications. Patients and methods: A total of 536 patients (314 males, 222 females; mean age: 55.6±10.8 years; range, 18 to 89 years) were retrospectively reviewed between January 2016 and January 2020. The patients were evaluated in two groups: 273 DVT patients (149 males, 124 females; mean age: 56.7±11.3 years) who received long-term therapy (six months) and 263 mechanical MVR patients (165 males, 98 females; mean age: 56.2±9.4 years). Both groups were compared in terms of the percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR), the time to reach the target international normalized ratio (INR), and warfarin related complications. Results: The number of total hospital visits and total INR measurements for six months in the MVR group was statistically significantly higher than in the DVT group (p<0.001). The duration and percentage of TTR in the first three and six months of the MVR group were statistically significantly higher than the DVT group (p<0.05). Conclusion: More MVR patients remained in the therapeutic range than DVT patients due to the frequent hospital visits of these patients for various reasons; thus, it may be beneficial to increase the frequency of follow-up examinations or measurements of INR in patients who have started warfarin treatment for an indication other than valve replacement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2022.1392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2022.1392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较华法林治疗不同适应症深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和机械二尖瓣置换术(MVR)患者的疗效和安全性。患者与方法:共536例患者,其中男性314例,女性222例;平均年龄:55.6±10.8岁;年龄在18至89岁之间),在2016年1月至2020年1月期间进行了回顾性审查。患者分为两组:273例深静脉血栓患者(男性149例,女性124例;平均年龄:56.7±11.3岁),接受长期治疗(6个月),263例机械性MVR患者(男性165例,女性98例;平均年龄:56.2±9.4岁)。比较两组患者在治疗范围内的时间百分比(TTR)、达到目标国际标准化比率(INR)的时间以及华法林相关并发症。结果:MVR组6个月的总住院次数和总INR测量值显著高于DVT组(p<0.001)。MVR组前3个月和前6个月TTR持续时间和百分比均高于DVT组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:由于各种原因,MVR患者就诊频繁,其维持在治疗范围内的患者多于DVT患者;因此,对于因瓣膜置换术以外的适应症而开始华法林治疗的患者,增加随访检查或INR测量的频率可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The treatment indication affects the time in therapeutic range
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the treatment in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) who were treated with warfarin for different indications. Patients and methods: A total of 536 patients (314 males, 222 females; mean age: 55.6±10.8 years; range, 18 to 89 years) were retrospectively reviewed between January 2016 and January 2020. The patients were evaluated in two groups: 273 DVT patients (149 males, 124 females; mean age: 56.7±11.3 years) who received long-term therapy (six months) and 263 mechanical MVR patients (165 males, 98 females; mean age: 56.2±9.4 years). Both groups were compared in terms of the percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR), the time to reach the target international normalized ratio (INR), and warfarin related complications. Results: The number of total hospital visits and total INR measurements for six months in the MVR group was statistically significantly higher than in the DVT group (p<0.001). The duration and percentage of TTR in the first three and six months of the MVR group were statistically significantly higher than the DVT group (p<0.05). Conclusion: More MVR patients remained in the therapeutic range than DVT patients due to the frequent hospital visits of these patients for various reasons; thus, it may be beneficial to increase the frequency of follow-up examinations or measurements of INR in patients who have started warfarin treatment for an indication other than valve replacement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信