检验评价:实践基础、认知基础和符号学基础比较方法

Sílvia Amélia Bim, Luciana Salgado, C. Leitão
{"title":"检验评价:实践基础、认知基础和符号学基础比较方法","authors":"Sílvia Amélia Bim, Luciana Salgado, C. Leitão","doi":"10.1145/3033701.3033710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a study comparing three inspection methods: Heuristic Evaluation, Cognitive Walkthrough and Semiotic Inspection Method. The objective is to enlighten the novice on HCI methodology improvement and, at the same time, offer new perspectives to experts on the subject. In order to do this, an analysis of the methods applicability on mobile devices is presented, as well as a set of parameters related to the time needed to apply each of the methods, the kind of knowledge generated and the insights created while applying each method. The results suggest that the inspection methods of cognitive and semiotic basis are especially interesting to generate new scientific knowledge in HCI.","PeriodicalId":345266,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation by Inspection: Comparing Methods of Practical, Cognitive and Semiotic Basis\",\"authors\":\"Sílvia Amélia Bim, Luciana Salgado, C. Leitão\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3033701.3033710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a study comparing three inspection methods: Heuristic Evaluation, Cognitive Walkthrough and Semiotic Inspection Method. The objective is to enlighten the novice on HCI methodology improvement and, at the same time, offer new perspectives to experts on the subject. In order to do this, an analysis of the methods applicability on mobile devices is presented, as well as a set of parameters related to the time needed to apply each of the methods, the kind of knowledge generated and the insights created while applying each method. The results suggest that the inspection methods of cognitive and semiotic basis are especially interesting to generate new scientific knowledge in HCI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3033701.3033710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3033701.3033710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对启发式评价法、认知漫游法和符号学检验法三种检验方法进行了比较研究。其目的是启发新手如何改进HCI方法,同时为该主题的专家提供新的视角。为了做到这一点,提出了对移动设备上的方法适用性的分析,以及与应用每种方法所需的时间,生成的知识类型和应用每种方法时创建的见解相关的一组参数。结果表明,认知基础和符号学基础的检验方法在HCI中产生新的科学知识方面尤其有趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation by Inspection: Comparing Methods of Practical, Cognitive and Semiotic Basis
This paper presents a study comparing three inspection methods: Heuristic Evaluation, Cognitive Walkthrough and Semiotic Inspection Method. The objective is to enlighten the novice on HCI methodology improvement and, at the same time, offer new perspectives to experts on the subject. In order to do this, an analysis of the methods applicability on mobile devices is presented, as well as a set of parameters related to the time needed to apply each of the methods, the kind of knowledge generated and the insights created while applying each method. The results suggest that the inspection methods of cognitive and semiotic basis are especially interesting to generate new scientific knowledge in HCI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信