{"title":"神圣的概念","authors":"M. Litwa","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvmd867c.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter compares the divine conception of Jesus in the gospel of Luke with divine conception in the historical writings of Plutarch. But authors who were contemporaries reject the language of divine-human sex as crude. They support a more subtle, though still physical form of divinely caused conception, through divine breath (pneuma) and power. Their historiographical goals were similar: to maximize the plausibility of their stories.","PeriodicalId":115187,"journal":{"name":"How the Gospels Became History","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divine Conception\",\"authors\":\"M. Litwa\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvmd867c.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter compares the divine conception of Jesus in the gospel of Luke with divine conception in the historical writings of Plutarch. But authors who were contemporaries reject the language of divine-human sex as crude. They support a more subtle, though still physical form of divinely caused conception, through divine breath (pneuma) and power. Their historiographical goals were similar: to maximize the plausibility of their stories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"How the Gospels Became History\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"How the Gospels Became History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmd867c.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How the Gospels Became History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmd867c.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter compares the divine conception of Jesus in the gospel of Luke with divine conception in the historical writings of Plutarch. But authors who were contemporaries reject the language of divine-human sex as crude. They support a more subtle, though still physical form of divinely caused conception, through divine breath (pneuma) and power. Their historiographical goals were similar: to maximize the plausibility of their stories.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
