衍生品定价

I. Gikhman
{"title":"衍生品定价","authors":"I. Gikhman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2140830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a fallacy of the Black and Scholes’ (BS) option pricing concept. The BS pricing is still the unique theoretical way for pricing derivatives though quite a large number of expert have found a lot of remarks concerning its theoretical and practical failings. We should note that implementation of BS methodology uses a real historical data and it is difficult to identify in practice whether deviations of the theoretical predictions of the option prices are due to incorrect interpretation of the BS option prices or deviations are implied by initial assumptions of the theoretical model regarding to say for example a stock model. In [4] one presented a critical point of view on BS pricing concept. After this paper was published BS methodology is continue to be the benchmark interpretation of the derivatives pricing. Our goal is to introduce more substantial formal arguments which demonstrate that Black and Scholes’ approach to derivative pricing is incorrect.","PeriodicalId":131015,"journal":{"name":"UNSW: Korea-Australasian Research Centre (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivatives Pricing\",\"authors\":\"I. Gikhman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2140830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a fallacy of the Black and Scholes’ (BS) option pricing concept. The BS pricing is still the unique theoretical way for pricing derivatives though quite a large number of expert have found a lot of remarks concerning its theoretical and practical failings. We should note that implementation of BS methodology uses a real historical data and it is difficult to identify in practice whether deviations of the theoretical predictions of the option prices are due to incorrect interpretation of the BS option prices or deviations are implied by initial assumptions of the theoretical model regarding to say for example a stock model. In [4] one presented a critical point of view on BS pricing concept. After this paper was published BS methodology is continue to be the benchmark interpretation of the derivatives pricing. Our goal is to introduce more substantial formal arguments which demonstrate that Black and Scholes’ approach to derivative pricing is incorrect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNSW: Korea-Australasian Research Centre (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNSW: Korea-Australasian Research Centre (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2140830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNSW: Korea-Australasian Research Centre (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2140830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了布莱克和斯科尔斯(BS)期权定价概念的谬误。BS定价仍然是衍生品定价的独特理论方式,尽管相当多的专家发现了许多关于其理论和实践缺陷的评论。我们应该注意到,BS方法的实施使用了真实的历史数据,在实践中很难确定期权价格理论预测的偏差是由于对BS期权价格的不正确解释,还是偏差是由理论模型的初始假设所隐含的,例如股票模型。在[4]中,有人提出了对BS定价概念的批判观点。本文发表后,BS方法仍是衍生品定价的基准解释。我们的目标是引入更多实质性的正式论证,证明布莱克和斯科尔斯的衍生品定价方法是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivatives Pricing
This paper presents a fallacy of the Black and Scholes’ (BS) option pricing concept. The BS pricing is still the unique theoretical way for pricing derivatives though quite a large number of expert have found a lot of remarks concerning its theoretical and practical failings. We should note that implementation of BS methodology uses a real historical data and it is difficult to identify in practice whether deviations of the theoretical predictions of the option prices are due to incorrect interpretation of the BS option prices or deviations are implied by initial assumptions of the theoretical model regarding to say for example a stock model. In [4] one presented a critical point of view on BS pricing concept. After this paper was published BS methodology is continue to be the benchmark interpretation of the derivatives pricing. Our goal is to introduce more substantial formal arguments which demonstrate that Black and Scholes’ approach to derivative pricing is incorrect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信