无人机与在线地形模型在铁路线路规划中的比较

W. Adi, Adya Aghastya, Nanda Ahda Imron, Nurul Fitria Apriliani, Izza Anwer, Porntep Puangprakhon
{"title":"无人机与在线地形模型在铁路线路规划中的比较","authors":"W. Adi, Adya Aghastya, Nanda Ahda Imron, Nurul Fitria Apriliani, Izza Anwer, Porntep Puangprakhon","doi":"10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research tried to compare Digital Elevation Model (DEM) results from UAV Drone Survey with online DEM with a study case a railway route planning from Semarang to Demak in Central Jawa. The terrain model was resulted by Agisoft Metashape software and was compared to DEM from GoogleEarth, BING, SRTM, ASTERGDEM and DEMNAS by using Global Mapper sofware. The comparison was conducted by generating contour drawing for each model, along with graphical and statistical analysis. The results shown that the DEM Model from UAV Drone Survey result can meet the standard accurcy needed. The result of comparison from other the online DEM resulted that DEMNAS and ASTER GDEM have the stronges correlation among other DEM resources. The finding suggested for a carefull consideration to use open source DEM Data for perelyminary design odr Detail Engineering Design, especially for railway infrastructure project.","PeriodicalId":268981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of UAV Drone and Online Terrain Model for Railway Route Planning\",\"authors\":\"W. Adi, Adya Aghastya, Nanda Ahda Imron, Nurul Fitria Apriliani, Izza Anwer, Porntep Puangprakhon\",\"doi\":\"10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research tried to compare Digital Elevation Model (DEM) results from UAV Drone Survey with online DEM with a study case a railway route planning from Semarang to Demak in Central Jawa. The terrain model was resulted by Agisoft Metashape software and was compared to DEM from GoogleEarth, BING, SRTM, ASTERGDEM and DEMNAS by using Global Mapper sofware. The comparison was conducted by generating contour drawing for each model, along with graphical and statistical analysis. The results shown that the DEM Model from UAV Drone Survey result can meet the standard accurcy needed. The result of comparison from other the online DEM resulted that DEMNAS and ASTER GDEM have the stronges correlation among other DEM resources. The finding suggested for a carefull consideration to use open source DEM Data for perelyminary design odr Detail Engineering Design, especially for railway infrastructure project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37367/jrtt.v1i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以中爪哇三宝垄至德马克的铁路路线规划为例,将无人机无人机调查的数字高程模型(DEM)结果与在线DEM进行比较。地形模型由Agisoft Metashape软件生成,并利用Global Mapper软件与GoogleEarth、BING、SRTM、ASTERGDEM和DEMNAS的DEM进行对比。通过生成各模型的等高线图进行比较,并进行图形化和统计分析。结果表明,基于无人机调查结果的DEM模型能够满足标准精度要求。与其他在线DEM的对比结果表明,DEMNAS和ASTER GDEM与其他DEM资源具有较强的相关性。这一发现建议在初步设计或详细工程设计中,特别是在铁路基础设施项目中,应慎重考虑使用开源DEM数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of UAV Drone and Online Terrain Model for Railway Route Planning
This research tried to compare Digital Elevation Model (DEM) results from UAV Drone Survey with online DEM with a study case a railway route planning from Semarang to Demak in Central Jawa. The terrain model was resulted by Agisoft Metashape software and was compared to DEM from GoogleEarth, BING, SRTM, ASTERGDEM and DEMNAS by using Global Mapper sofware. The comparison was conducted by generating contour drawing for each model, along with graphical and statistical analysis. The results shown that the DEM Model from UAV Drone Survey result can meet the standard accurcy needed. The result of comparison from other the online DEM resulted that DEMNAS and ASTER GDEM have the stronges correlation among other DEM resources. The finding suggested for a carefull consideration to use open source DEM Data for perelyminary design odr Detail Engineering Design, especially for railway infrastructure project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信