王室、法定承办人和地方当局的发展;公共工程命令

A. Bowes
{"title":"王室、法定承办人和地方当局的发展;公共工程命令","authors":"A. Bowes","doi":"10.1093/9780198833253.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years planning legislation did not bind the Crown. This resulted from the application of a fundamental principle of the constitution that the Crown was not bound by statute unless expressly stated to be so, or bound by necessary implication.","PeriodicalId":168691,"journal":{"name":"A Practical Approach to Planning Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development by the Crown, Statutory Undertakers, and Local Authorities; Public Works Orders\",\"authors\":\"A. Bowes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/9780198833253.003.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For many years planning legislation did not bind the Crown. This resulted from the application of a fundamental principle of the constitution that the Crown was not bound by statute unless expressly stated to be so, or bound by necessary implication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Practical Approach to Planning Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Practical Approach to Planning Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198833253.003.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Practical Approach to Planning Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198833253.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,规划立法对王室没有约束力。这是由于宪法的一项基本原则的适用,即国王不受法规的约束,除非明文规定如此,或受到必要的暗示的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development by the Crown, Statutory Undertakers, and Local Authorities; Public Works Orders
For many years planning legislation did not bind the Crown. This resulted from the application of a fundamental principle of the constitution that the Crown was not bound by statute unless expressly stated to be so, or bound by necessary implication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信