纳粹的遗产吗?战后德国连续性问题新研究

A. Wirsching
{"title":"纳粹的遗产吗?战后德国连续性问题新研究","authors":"A. Wirsching","doi":"10.1353/gych.2021.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The contribution by Andreas Wirsching deals with the recent significant expansion of historical research into the continuities of personnel and mentalities between the Nazi regime and the early Federal Republic of Germany. Concentrating on the ministerial bureaucracy, and specifically on the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Wirsching notes a pattern of considerable continuities, the careful evaluation of which has been made possible by the availability of new archival sources. Summarizing the current state of research, the article focuses on how the burdens of the Nazi past were addressed in the German bureaucracy and how they related to the longerterm continuities of anti-pluralism, socio-moral conservatism, and authoritarian étatism. At the same time, Wirsching emphasizes the manifold learning processes that took hold during the postwar period, which allowed former officials of the Nazi regime to adapt to the conditions of the new democracy or even to help shape it.","PeriodicalId":237244,"journal":{"name":"German Yearbook of Contemporary History","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nazi Legacies? New Research on the Question of Continuities in Postwar Germany\",\"authors\":\"A. Wirsching\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gych.2021.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The contribution by Andreas Wirsching deals with the recent significant expansion of historical research into the continuities of personnel and mentalities between the Nazi regime and the early Federal Republic of Germany. Concentrating on the ministerial bureaucracy, and specifically on the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Wirsching notes a pattern of considerable continuities, the careful evaluation of which has been made possible by the availability of new archival sources. Summarizing the current state of research, the article focuses on how the burdens of the Nazi past were addressed in the German bureaucracy and how they related to the longerterm continuities of anti-pluralism, socio-moral conservatism, and authoritarian étatism. At the same time, Wirsching emphasizes the manifold learning processes that took hold during the postwar period, which allowed former officials of the Nazi regime to adapt to the conditions of the new democracy or even to help shape it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Yearbook of Contemporary History\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Yearbook of Contemporary History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gych.2021.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Yearbook of Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gych.2021.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Andreas Wirsching的贡献涉及最近对纳粹政权与早期德意志联邦共和国之间人员和心态连续性的历史研究的重大扩展。Wirsching着重于部级官僚机构,特别是联邦内政部,注意到一种相当连续性的模式,由于有了新的档案来源,对这种模式进行仔细的评价成为可能。本文总结了目前的研究现状,重点关注纳粹过去的负担如何在德国官僚机构中得到解决,以及它们如何与反多元主义、社会道德保守主义和专制主义的长期连续性联系起来。与此同时,Wirsching强调了战后时期的多元学习过程,这使得纳粹政权的前官员能够适应新民主主义的条件,甚至帮助塑造它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nazi Legacies? New Research on the Question of Continuities in Postwar Germany
Abstract:The contribution by Andreas Wirsching deals with the recent significant expansion of historical research into the continuities of personnel and mentalities between the Nazi regime and the early Federal Republic of Germany. Concentrating on the ministerial bureaucracy, and specifically on the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Wirsching notes a pattern of considerable continuities, the careful evaluation of which has been made possible by the availability of new archival sources. Summarizing the current state of research, the article focuses on how the burdens of the Nazi past were addressed in the German bureaucracy and how they related to the longerterm continuities of anti-pluralism, socio-moral conservatism, and authoritarian étatism. At the same time, Wirsching emphasizes the manifold learning processes that took hold during the postwar period, which allowed former officials of the Nazi regime to adapt to the conditions of the new democracy or even to help shape it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信