用更少的工人众包

Xiaoyu Huang, Zhengzheng Xian, Qingsong Zeng
{"title":"用更少的工人众包","authors":"Xiaoyu Huang, Zhengzheng Xian, Qingsong Zeng","doi":"10.1109/SKG.2018.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crowdsourcing mechanism, as an effective and economic alternative in data science study, has attracted substantial research interests in recent years. However, despite of numerous successful crowdsourcing applications, many crowdsourcers still suffer from the high cost issue. This is mainly due to the fact that most of the crowd workers are usually not professional experts, and thus, in order to ensure the quality of crowdsourcing, extra investment is introduced by hiring many crowd workers to work on every task multiple times to inhabit the noisy submissions. In this article, we propose an approach that can mitigate the crowdsourcer's investment by using less human efforts while at the same time still has provable guarantees for the refined results. Experimental results on two real-world datasets are inspiring and consistent with the theoretical analysis.","PeriodicalId":265760,"journal":{"name":"2018 14th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids (SKG)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crowdsourcing with Fewer Workers\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Huang, Zhengzheng Xian, Qingsong Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SKG.2018.00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The crowdsourcing mechanism, as an effective and economic alternative in data science study, has attracted substantial research interests in recent years. However, despite of numerous successful crowdsourcing applications, many crowdsourcers still suffer from the high cost issue. This is mainly due to the fact that most of the crowd workers are usually not professional experts, and thus, in order to ensure the quality of crowdsourcing, extra investment is introduced by hiring many crowd workers to work on every task multiple times to inhabit the noisy submissions. In this article, we propose an approach that can mitigate the crowdsourcer's investment by using less human efforts while at the same time still has provable guarantees for the refined results. Experimental results on two real-world datasets are inspiring and consistent with the theoretical analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 14th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids (SKG)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 14th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids (SKG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SKG.2018.00023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 14th International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids (SKG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SKG.2018.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众包机制作为数据科学研究中一种有效且经济的替代方法,近年来引起了大量的研究兴趣。然而,尽管有许多成功的众包应用,许多众包商仍然受到高成本问题的困扰。这主要是因为大多数众包工作者通常不是专业的专家,因此,为了保证众包的质量,就会引入额外的投资,聘请许多众包工作者对每个任务进行多次工作,以适应嘈杂的提交。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,可以通过使用更少的人力来减轻众包商的投资,同时仍然对精炼的结果有可证明的保证。在两个实际数据集上的实验结果与理论分析是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crowdsourcing with Fewer Workers
The crowdsourcing mechanism, as an effective and economic alternative in data science study, has attracted substantial research interests in recent years. However, despite of numerous successful crowdsourcing applications, many crowdsourcers still suffer from the high cost issue. This is mainly due to the fact that most of the crowd workers are usually not professional experts, and thus, in order to ensure the quality of crowdsourcing, extra investment is introduced by hiring many crowd workers to work on every task multiple times to inhabit the noisy submissions. In this article, we propose an approach that can mitigate the crowdsourcer's investment by using less human efforts while at the same time still has provable guarantees for the refined results. Experimental results on two real-world datasets are inspiring and consistent with the theoretical analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信