简单和快速偏锁

N. Vasudevan, Kedar S. Namjoshi, S. Edwards
{"title":"简单和快速偏锁","authors":"N. Vasudevan, Kedar S. Namjoshi, S. Edwards","doi":"10.1145/1854273.1854287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locks are used to ensure exclusive access to shared memory locations. Unfortunately, lock operations are expensive, so much work has been done on optimizing their performance for common access patterns. One such pattern is found in networking applications, where there is a single thread dominating lock accesses. An important special case arises when a single-threaded program calls a thread-safe library that uses locks. An effective way to optimize the dominant-thread pattern is to “bias” the lock implementation so that accesses by the dominant thread have negligible overhead. We take this approach in this work: we simplify and generalize existing techniques for biased locks, producing a large design space with many trade-offs. For example, if we assume the dominant process acquires the lock infinitely often (a reasonable assumption for packet processing), it is possible to make the dominant process perform a lock operation without expensive fence or compare-and-swap instructions. This gives a very low overhead solution; we confirm its efficacy by experiments. We show how these constructions can be extended for lock reservation, re-reservation, and to reader-writer situations.","PeriodicalId":422461,"journal":{"name":"2010 19th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simple and fast biased locks\",\"authors\":\"N. Vasudevan, Kedar S. Namjoshi, S. Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1854273.1854287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Locks are used to ensure exclusive access to shared memory locations. Unfortunately, lock operations are expensive, so much work has been done on optimizing their performance for common access patterns. One such pattern is found in networking applications, where there is a single thread dominating lock accesses. An important special case arises when a single-threaded program calls a thread-safe library that uses locks. An effective way to optimize the dominant-thread pattern is to “bias” the lock implementation so that accesses by the dominant thread have negligible overhead. We take this approach in this work: we simplify and generalize existing techniques for biased locks, producing a large design space with many trade-offs. For example, if we assume the dominant process acquires the lock infinitely often (a reasonable assumption for packet processing), it is possible to make the dominant process perform a lock operation without expensive fence or compare-and-swap instructions. This gives a very low overhead solution; we confirm its efficacy by experiments. We show how these constructions can be extended for lock reservation, re-reservation, and to reader-writer situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 19th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT)\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 19th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1854273.1854287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 19th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1854273.1854287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

锁用于确保对共享内存位置的独占访问。不幸的是,锁操作的成本很高,为了针对常见的访问模式优化它们的性能,已经做了很多工作。在网络应用程序中可以找到一种这样的模式,其中有一个线程控制锁访问。当单线程程序调用使用锁的线程安全库时,会出现一个重要的特殊情况。优化主线程模式的一种有效方法是“偏置”锁实现,以便主线程的访问开销可以忽略不计。我们在这项工作中采用了这种方法:我们简化和推广了现有的偏置锁技术,产生了一个具有许多权衡的大设计空间。例如,如果我们假设主导进程无限频繁地获得锁(对于包处理来说是一个合理的假设),那么就有可能让主导进程执行锁操作,而不需要昂贵的fence或比较-交换指令。这提供了一个非常低开销的解决方案;通过实验证实了其有效性。我们将展示如何将这些结构扩展到锁保留、重新保留和读写情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simple and fast biased locks
Locks are used to ensure exclusive access to shared memory locations. Unfortunately, lock operations are expensive, so much work has been done on optimizing their performance for common access patterns. One such pattern is found in networking applications, where there is a single thread dominating lock accesses. An important special case arises when a single-threaded program calls a thread-safe library that uses locks. An effective way to optimize the dominant-thread pattern is to “bias” the lock implementation so that accesses by the dominant thread have negligible overhead. We take this approach in this work: we simplify and generalize existing techniques for biased locks, producing a large design space with many trade-offs. For example, if we assume the dominant process acquires the lock infinitely often (a reasonable assumption for packet processing), it is possible to make the dominant process perform a lock operation without expensive fence or compare-and-swap instructions. This gives a very low overhead solution; we confirm its efficacy by experiments. We show how these constructions can be extended for lock reservation, re-reservation, and to reader-writer situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信