司法审查实践和程序的发展2021

Judicial Review Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205

Kimberley Ziya

{"title":"司法审查实践和程序的发展2021","authors":"Kimberley Ziya","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. There have been two cases dealing with the court’s jurisdiction pursuant to R (Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in the context of urgent applications. The Hamid case provided for a procedure by which the court could ask a legal representative – whether a solicitor or counsel – to show cause why the conduct of the legal representative should not be considered for referral to their respective regulatory body or otherwise be admonished.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developments in Judicial Review Practice and Procedure 2021\",\"authors\":\"Kimberley Ziya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. There have been two cases dealing with the court’s jurisdiction pursuant to R (Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in the context of urgent applications. The Hamid case provided for a procedure by which the court could ask a legal representative – whether a solicitor or counsel – to show cause why the conduct of the legal representative should not be considered for referral to their respective regulatory body or otherwise be admonished.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1968205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2. 根据R (Hamid)诉内政部国务秘书一案，在紧急申请的情况下，有两起案件涉及法院的管辖权。哈米德案规定了一种程序，法院可以通过该程序要求法律代表- -无论是律师还是律师- -提出理由，说明为什么不应考虑将该法律代表的行为移交给其各自的监管机构或以其他方式予以训诫。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Developments in Judicial Review Practice and Procedure 2021

2. There have been two cases dealing with the court’s jurisdiction pursuant to R (Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in the context of urgent applications. The Hamid case provided for a procedure by which the court could ask a legal representative – whether a solicitor or counsel – to show cause why the conduct of the legal representative should not be considered for referral to their respective regulatory body or otherwise be admonished.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Judicial Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量