使用实值和符号模型的交易波动性的盈利能力

C. Schittenkopf, P. Tiňo, G. Dorffner
{"title":"使用实值和符号模型的交易波动性的盈利能力","authors":"C. Schittenkopf, P. Tiňo, G. Dorffner","doi":"10.1109/CIFER.2000.844586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two notions of volatility in literature: historical volatility and implied volatility. We concentrate on the latter by analyzing the profitability of a pure volatility trading strategy which is delta-neutral and independent of an option pricing model, for the German stock index DAX. Several very different methods ranging from linear and nonlinear, real-valued models to symbolic models of volatility changes are applied to predict the change in volatility to the next trading day and to gain profits by buying or selling straddles accordingly. The trading performance is evaluated for one historical and one implied volatility measure. The results are carefully evaluated concerning transaction costs, stationarity issues, and statistical significance. The main contribution of the paper is that, for the first time, the trading performance of models based on different modelling paradigms is compared.","PeriodicalId":308591,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr) (Cat. No.00TH8520)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The profitability of trading volatility using real-valued and symbolic models\",\"authors\":\"C. Schittenkopf, P. Tiňo, G. Dorffner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIFER.2000.844586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two notions of volatility in literature: historical volatility and implied volatility. We concentrate on the latter by analyzing the profitability of a pure volatility trading strategy which is delta-neutral and independent of an option pricing model, for the German stock index DAX. Several very different methods ranging from linear and nonlinear, real-valued models to symbolic models of volatility changes are applied to predict the change in volatility to the next trading day and to gain profits by buying or selling straddles accordingly. The trading performance is evaluated for one historical and one implied volatility measure. The results are carefully evaluated concerning transaction costs, stationarity issues, and statistical significance. The main contribution of the paper is that, for the first time, the trading performance of models based on different modelling paradigms is compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr) (Cat. No.00TH8520)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr) (Cat. No.00TH8520)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFER.2000.844586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr) (Cat. No.00TH8520)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFER.2000.844586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

文献中波动性有两种概念:历史波动率和隐含波动率。我们通过分析纯波动率交易策略的盈利能力来关注后者,该策略是delta中性的,独立于期权定价模型,用于德国股指DAX。从线性和非线性,实值模型到波动率变化的符号模型,几种非常不同的方法被应用于预测下一个交易日的波动率变化,并通过相应地买入或卖出跨界交易获得利润。交易表现是评估一个历史和隐含波动率的措施。结果是仔细评估有关交易成本,平稳性问题,和统计显著性。本文的主要贡献在于,首次比较了基于不同建模范式的模型的交易绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The profitability of trading volatility using real-valued and symbolic models
There are two notions of volatility in literature: historical volatility and implied volatility. We concentrate on the latter by analyzing the profitability of a pure volatility trading strategy which is delta-neutral and independent of an option pricing model, for the German stock index DAX. Several very different methods ranging from linear and nonlinear, real-valued models to symbolic models of volatility changes are applied to predict the change in volatility to the next trading day and to gain profits by buying or selling straddles accordingly. The trading performance is evaluated for one historical and one implied volatility measure. The results are carefully evaluated concerning transaction costs, stationarity issues, and statistical significance. The main contribution of the paper is that, for the first time, the trading performance of models based on different modelling paradigms is compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信