预测通货膨胀:投资组合侵蚀还是崩溃?

George Crawford, J. Liew, A. Marks
{"title":"预测通货膨胀:投资组合侵蚀还是崩溃?","authors":"George Crawford, J. Liew, A. Marks","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2156966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the probability of high inflation; how high, when? These questions are important to all investors since even the 2% level to which we are accustomed will cut an investor’s portfolio by over 17% during a decade. This 2% level is the target of the Federal Reserve, along with near 0% interest rates, for a risk free rate of -2%. This guarantees portfolio erosion absent risk-taking, which could result in even lower returns if the risks of loss are realized. An AARP article characterizes this as The War On Savers. Higher inflation is possible, at 4% or more, with even worse effects. There are heated debates about the probability and timing of high inflation, but our review of the extensive literature reveals no reliable way to predict its onset or extent. Expert opinion predicts inflation best, but it has failed to predict the onset or extent of inflation, and past inflation predicts the experts’ estimates as well as the experts predict future inflation. Debt levels are very high, and inflation is one of the possibilities for deleveraging. The Japanese have proved that high debt can exist without inflation for at least a decade or two, at least in their particular circumstances. Our high debt levels are partly due to the housing collapse. We propose months of unsold housing inventory as an indicator likely to decline before a sustained housing rally, and shelter is both the largest single component of inflation and affects consumer wealth and psychology. We also propose that portfolio erosion through 2% inflation is likely to continue for the present, and that much higher inflation is unlikely until the economy strengthens, but that it remains a risk until deleveraging has occurred by some other means. We suggest monitoring banks’ Federal Reserve deposit levels, which are reported weekly, as another barometer of inflation risk. A portfolio invested in traditional liquid assets – stocks, bonds, and cash – is unlikely to weather high inflation intact; the extent of the damage to each of these asset categories varies widely among inflationary periods and is volatile within these periods.","PeriodicalId":445951,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Prices) (Topic)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Inflation: Portfolio Erosion or Collapse?\",\"authors\":\"George Crawford, J. Liew, A. Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2156966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is the probability of high inflation; how high, when? These questions are important to all investors since even the 2% level to which we are accustomed will cut an investor’s portfolio by over 17% during a decade. This 2% level is the target of the Federal Reserve, along with near 0% interest rates, for a risk free rate of -2%. This guarantees portfolio erosion absent risk-taking, which could result in even lower returns if the risks of loss are realized. An AARP article characterizes this as The War On Savers. Higher inflation is possible, at 4% or more, with even worse effects. There are heated debates about the probability and timing of high inflation, but our review of the extensive literature reveals no reliable way to predict its onset or extent. Expert opinion predicts inflation best, but it has failed to predict the onset or extent of inflation, and past inflation predicts the experts’ estimates as well as the experts predict future inflation. Debt levels are very high, and inflation is one of the possibilities for deleveraging. The Japanese have proved that high debt can exist without inflation for at least a decade or two, at least in their particular circumstances. Our high debt levels are partly due to the housing collapse. We propose months of unsold housing inventory as an indicator likely to decline before a sustained housing rally, and shelter is both the largest single component of inflation and affects consumer wealth and psychology. We also propose that portfolio erosion through 2% inflation is likely to continue for the present, and that much higher inflation is unlikely until the economy strengthens, but that it remains a risk until deleveraging has occurred by some other means. We suggest monitoring banks’ Federal Reserve deposit levels, which are reported weekly, as another barometer of inflation risk. A portfolio invested in traditional liquid assets – stocks, bonds, and cash – is unlikely to weather high inflation intact; the extent of the damage to each of these asset categories varies widely among inflationary periods and is volatile within these periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Prices) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Prices) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2156966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Prices) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2156966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高通胀的概率是多少?多高,什么时候?这些问题对所有投资者都很重要,因为即使是我们习惯的2%的水平也会在十年内使投资者的投资组合减少17%以上。这个2%的水平是美联储的目标,与接近0%的利率一起,无风险利率为-2%。这就保证了投资组合在没有承担风险的情况下受到侵蚀,如果损失的风险得以实现,这可能导致更低的回报。美国退休人员协会(AARP)的一篇文章将其描述为对储蓄者的战争。更高的通货膨胀率是可能的,达到4%或更高,其影响甚至更糟。关于高通货膨胀的可能性和时间有激烈的争论,但我们对大量文献的回顾显示,没有可靠的方法来预测其开始或程度。专家意见最能预测通货膨胀,但它无法预测通货膨胀的开始或程度,过去的通货膨胀既能预测专家的估计,也能预测专家对未来通货膨胀的预测。债务水平非常高,通胀是去杠杆化的可能性之一。日本已经证明,至少在他们的特殊情况下,高债务可以在没有通胀的情况下存在至少10年或20年。我们的高债务水平部分是由于房地产市场的崩溃。我们认为,在房价持续上涨之前,未售出房屋库存的月份可能会下降,住房既是通货膨胀的最大单一组成部分,也会影响消费者的财富和心理。我们还认为,目前2%的通胀率可能会继续侵蚀投资组合,在经济走强之前,通胀不太可能大幅上升,但在以其他方式实现去杠杆化之前,这仍然是一种风险。我们建议监测银行的美联储存款水平,这是通胀风险的另一个晴雨表,每周都会报告一次。投资于传统流动资产(股票、债券和现金)的投资组合不太可能毫发无损地经受住高通胀的考验;这些资产类别的损失程度在不同的通胀时期差别很大,并且在这些时期内是不稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Inflation: Portfolio Erosion or Collapse?
What is the probability of high inflation; how high, when? These questions are important to all investors since even the 2% level to which we are accustomed will cut an investor’s portfolio by over 17% during a decade. This 2% level is the target of the Federal Reserve, along with near 0% interest rates, for a risk free rate of -2%. This guarantees portfolio erosion absent risk-taking, which could result in even lower returns if the risks of loss are realized. An AARP article characterizes this as The War On Savers. Higher inflation is possible, at 4% or more, with even worse effects. There are heated debates about the probability and timing of high inflation, but our review of the extensive literature reveals no reliable way to predict its onset or extent. Expert opinion predicts inflation best, but it has failed to predict the onset or extent of inflation, and past inflation predicts the experts’ estimates as well as the experts predict future inflation. Debt levels are very high, and inflation is one of the possibilities for deleveraging. The Japanese have proved that high debt can exist without inflation for at least a decade or two, at least in their particular circumstances. Our high debt levels are partly due to the housing collapse. We propose months of unsold housing inventory as an indicator likely to decline before a sustained housing rally, and shelter is both the largest single component of inflation and affects consumer wealth and psychology. We also propose that portfolio erosion through 2% inflation is likely to continue for the present, and that much higher inflation is unlikely until the economy strengthens, but that it remains a risk until deleveraging has occurred by some other means. We suggest monitoring banks’ Federal Reserve deposit levels, which are reported weekly, as another barometer of inflation risk. A portfolio invested in traditional liquid assets – stocks, bonds, and cash – is unlikely to weather high inflation intact; the extent of the damage to each of these asset categories varies widely among inflationary periods and is volatile within these periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信