{"title":"新古典经济学家没有误读古诺的竞争论——评诺米迪斯","authors":"R. Serrano","doi":"10.1080/10370196.2023.2232524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This is a comment on Nomidis' “Revisiting Cournot and Neoclassical Economics”. Using simple examples, the focus is on the conditions that lead to Cournot's competitive limit result, showcasing the connections between the Cournot model and competitive equilibrium. Citing original sources, it is argued that the Neoclassical economists did not misunderstand Cournot, as Nomidis asserts.","PeriodicalId":143586,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neoclassical Economists Did Not Misinterpret Cournot on Competition: A Comment on Nomidis\",\"authors\":\"R. Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10370196.2023.2232524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This is a comment on Nomidis' “Revisiting Cournot and Neoclassical Economics”. Using simple examples, the focus is on the conditions that lead to Cournot's competitive limit result, showcasing the connections between the Cournot model and competitive equilibrium. Citing original sources, it is argued that the Neoclassical economists did not misunderstand Cournot, as Nomidis asserts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2023.2232524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2023.2232524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Neoclassical Economists Did Not Misinterpret Cournot on Competition: A Comment on Nomidis
Abstract This is a comment on Nomidis' “Revisiting Cournot and Neoclassical Economics”. Using simple examples, the focus is on the conditions that lead to Cournot's competitive limit result, showcasing the connections between the Cournot model and competitive equilibrium. Citing original sources, it is argued that the Neoclassical economists did not misunderstand Cournot, as Nomidis asserts.