“同理心真的很重要”:通过关爱社区改善本科STEM教育

Eva Fernandez, M. Fraboni, Jennifer Valad, Sabrina Avila, Allan Edmond, Corinna Singleman
{"title":"“同理心真的很重要”:通过关爱社区改善本科STEM教育","authors":"Eva Fernandez, M. Fraboni, Jennifer Valad, Sabrina Avila, Allan Edmond, Corinna Singleman","doi":"10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the methods developed to improve STEM success for students at two public urban institutions, a project whose aim is to improve academic outcomes for undergraduate students, especially for those most vulnerable and least likely to succeed in this student population. The theory of change that underpins the project – including its activities and its evaluation plan – posits that three interlocked activities (course redesign, peer mentors and articulation) will lead to improvements in academic outcomes and ultimately contribute to the overarching goal of increasing the number of students from underserved backgrounds who graduate with baccalaureate STEM degrees. The project focusses on the first courses students take in STEM, where they are also most likely to fail. We describe the methodology developed for faculty development and the organizational structure of the peer mentoring component for these courses. Both of these components constitute safe spaces where faculty and peer mentors learn to support students using evidence-based and inclusive instructional practices. Courses redesigned by faculty were offered following a cluster-level randomized control trial design, where sections were assigned to treatment (with or without a peer) or control. These interventions have a positive impact on cumulative GPA, according to preliminary analyses. The project also has a positive effect on faculty participants and on peer mentors, both groups now better prepared to jointly deliver STEM curricula in more effective ways. Among the reasons why this works, instructor empathy surfaces as playing a leading role in academic outcomes for undergraduate students.","PeriodicalId":112157,"journal":{"name":"Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Empathy Is Really Important’: Improving Undergraduate STEM Education through a Community of Care\",\"authors\":\"Eva Fernandez, M. Fraboni, Jennifer Valad, Sabrina Avila, Allan Edmond, Corinna Singleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores the methods developed to improve STEM success for students at two public urban institutions, a project whose aim is to improve academic outcomes for undergraduate students, especially for those most vulnerable and least likely to succeed in this student population. The theory of change that underpins the project – including its activities and its evaluation plan – posits that three interlocked activities (course redesign, peer mentors and articulation) will lead to improvements in academic outcomes and ultimately contribute to the overarching goal of increasing the number of students from underserved backgrounds who graduate with baccalaureate STEM degrees. The project focusses on the first courses students take in STEM, where they are also most likely to fail. We describe the methodology developed for faculty development and the organizational structure of the peer mentoring component for these courses. Both of these components constitute safe spaces where faculty and peer mentors learn to support students using evidence-based and inclusive instructional practices. Courses redesigned by faculty were offered following a cluster-level randomized control trial design, where sections were assigned to treatment (with or without a peer) or control. These interventions have a positive impact on cumulative GPA, according to preliminary analyses. The project also has a positive effect on faculty participants and on peer mentors, both groups now better prepared to jointly deliver STEM curricula in more effective ways. Among the reasons why this works, instructor empathy surfaces as playing a leading role in academic outcomes for undergraduate students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本章探讨了两所公立城市机构为提高学生在STEM方面的成功而开发的方法,该项目旨在提高本科生的学术成果,特别是那些最脆弱和最不可能成功的学生群体。支撑该项目的变革理论——包括其活动和评估计划——假设三个相互关联的活动(课程重新设计、同伴导师和表达)将导致学术成果的改善,并最终有助于实现增加来自服务不足背景的学生获得STEM学士学位的总体目标。该项目重点关注学生在STEM课程中学习的第一门课程,这些课程也是他们最容易挂科的。我们描述了为教师发展而开发的方法和这些课程的同伴指导组成部分的组织结构。这两个组成部分构成了教师和同伴导师学习使用循证和包容性教学实践来支持学生的安全空间。由教师重新设计的课程按照集群水平随机对照试验设计提供,其中部分被分配到治疗组(有或没有同伴)或对照组。根据初步分析,这些干预措施对累积GPA有积极影响。该项目还对教师参与者和同伴导师产生了积极影响,这两个群体现在都准备好了以更有效的方式共同提供STEM课程。在这一结果的原因中,教师共情似乎在本科生的学业成绩中起着主导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Empathy Is Really Important’: Improving Undergraduate STEM Education through a Community of Care
This chapter explores the methods developed to improve STEM success for students at two public urban institutions, a project whose aim is to improve academic outcomes for undergraduate students, especially for those most vulnerable and least likely to succeed in this student population. The theory of change that underpins the project – including its activities and its evaluation plan – posits that three interlocked activities (course redesign, peer mentors and articulation) will lead to improvements in academic outcomes and ultimately contribute to the overarching goal of increasing the number of students from underserved backgrounds who graduate with baccalaureate STEM degrees. The project focusses on the first courses students take in STEM, where they are also most likely to fail. We describe the methodology developed for faculty development and the organizational structure of the peer mentoring component for these courses. Both of these components constitute safe spaces where faculty and peer mentors learn to support students using evidence-based and inclusive instructional practices. Courses redesigned by faculty were offered following a cluster-level randomized control trial design, where sections were assigned to treatment (with or without a peer) or control. These interventions have a positive impact on cumulative GPA, according to preliminary analyses. The project also has a positive effect on faculty participants and on peer mentors, both groups now better prepared to jointly deliver STEM curricula in more effective ways. Among the reasons why this works, instructor empathy surfaces as playing a leading role in academic outcomes for undergraduate students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信