微观层面互动中的知识流动:中国-赞比亚医疗合作中的交流过程分析

Peter Schumacher, M. Leung
{"title":"微观层面互动中的知识流动:中国-赞比亚医疗合作中的交流过程分析","authors":"Peter Schumacher, M. Leung","doi":"10.1080/21931674.2018.1427666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although Chinese medical aid to African countries is not a new phenomenon, the scale and scope of these engagements has changed significantly after the turn of the Millennium. Chinese government officials don’t grow tired to represent their country as new alternative for African medical development, a narrative that is accompanied with a host of figures such as money donated, Chinese personnel deployed, African practitioners trained and patients treated. However, little is known about the actual events behind these numbers. Drawing on the academic debate around the relationality of mobility and knowledge this paper is looking at the embodied experiences of Chinese-Zambian medical co-operation. By proposing a communication model as conceptual framework, this paper addresses recent criticism that too much scholarly attention has been given to the successful transfer of knowledge, whereas factors that prevent exchanges were largely ignored. Through the application of this model to analyze data obtained during six weeks of fieldwork in Zambia, it was possible to identify several prisms which affect the exchange of knowledge between the Chinese and Zambian teams in our case study decisively.","PeriodicalId":413830,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Social Review","volume":"25 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge (im)mobility through mirco-level interactions: An analysis of the communication process in Chinese-Zambian medical co-operation\",\"authors\":\"Peter Schumacher, M. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21931674.2018.1427666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although Chinese medical aid to African countries is not a new phenomenon, the scale and scope of these engagements has changed significantly after the turn of the Millennium. Chinese government officials don’t grow tired to represent their country as new alternative for African medical development, a narrative that is accompanied with a host of figures such as money donated, Chinese personnel deployed, African practitioners trained and patients treated. However, little is known about the actual events behind these numbers. Drawing on the academic debate around the relationality of mobility and knowledge this paper is looking at the embodied experiences of Chinese-Zambian medical co-operation. By proposing a communication model as conceptual framework, this paper addresses recent criticism that too much scholarly attention has been given to the successful transfer of knowledge, whereas factors that prevent exchanges were largely ignored. Through the application of this model to analyze data obtained during six weeks of fieldwork in Zambia, it was possible to identify several prisms which affect the exchange of knowledge between the Chinese and Zambian teams in our case study decisively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Social Review\",\"volume\":\"25 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Social Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1427666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Social Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2018.1427666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

虽然中国对非洲国家的医疗援助不是一个新现象,但这些援助的规模和范围在世纪之交之后发生了重大变化。中国政府官员不厌其烦地把自己的国家描绘成非洲医疗发展的新选择,这种叙述伴随着一大堆数字,比如捐款、中国人员部署、非洲医生培训和患者治疗。然而,人们对这些数字背后的真实事件知之甚少。借鉴学术界关于流动性和知识之间关系的争论,本文着眼于中赞医疗合作的具体经验。通过提出一个沟通模型作为概念框架,本文解决了最近的批评,即太多的学术关注被给予了成功的知识转移,而阻碍交流的因素在很大程度上被忽视了。通过应用该模型来分析在赞比亚为期六周的实地工作中获得的数据,可以确定在我们的案例研究中影响中国和赞比亚团队之间知识交流的几个棱镜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge (im)mobility through mirco-level interactions: An analysis of the communication process in Chinese-Zambian medical co-operation
Abstract Although Chinese medical aid to African countries is not a new phenomenon, the scale and scope of these engagements has changed significantly after the turn of the Millennium. Chinese government officials don’t grow tired to represent their country as new alternative for African medical development, a narrative that is accompanied with a host of figures such as money donated, Chinese personnel deployed, African practitioners trained and patients treated. However, little is known about the actual events behind these numbers. Drawing on the academic debate around the relationality of mobility and knowledge this paper is looking at the embodied experiences of Chinese-Zambian medical co-operation. By proposing a communication model as conceptual framework, this paper addresses recent criticism that too much scholarly attention has been given to the successful transfer of knowledge, whereas factors that prevent exchanges were largely ignored. Through the application of this model to analyze data obtained during six weeks of fieldwork in Zambia, it was possible to identify several prisms which affect the exchange of knowledge between the Chinese and Zambian teams in our case study decisively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信