我们将何去何从?

P. Bernstein, M. Culnan, L. Hoffman, D. Hughes, D. Ingraham, M. Kapor, E. Lieberman, P. Neumann, D. Parker, C. Schiffries, R. Veeder, J. Warren
{"title":"我们将何去何从?","authors":"P. Bernstein, M. Culnan, L. Hoffman, D. Hughes, D. Ingraham, M. Kapor, E. Lieberman, P. Neumann, D. Parker, C. Schiffries, R. Veeder, J. Warren","doi":"10.1109/CCFP.1991.664765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION – MARTIN L. BLANEY In the process of putting this symposium together with a diverse group of conservation partners, a momentum of purpose and resolve developed that seems to be unprecedented in our region. Upon witnessing our upland oak forests and woodlands slowly degrade in health and vigor through the last decades of our collective careers and then to watch their accelerated decline in the last three years has brought us to the same question. Can we continue in our own spheres of responsibilities and allow such a shift in forest communities to occur without our concerted efforts to find and affect solutions? With defiant conviction, the response was a collective “not on our watch.” A strategy formed around the oak sustainability issue that had its beginnings in the Forestry Subcommittee of the Arkansas Wildlife Federation with the formation of a coalition of partners. At the same time, acting as a catalyst, an issue of the Arkansas Wildlife magazine focusing on oak decline was printed and widely circulated. The many and widely favorable responses received from the widespread distribution of this publication, further heightened the resolve of the coalition to the possibility of changing public opinion regarding the need for human intervention into the oak communities. With the onset of the red oak borer outbreak, questions from the public regarding hardwood forest management began to accelerate and the obvious gaps and conflicts in our professional understandings was apparent. These events lead to the eventual need of assembling the various resource professions to gain a cohesive awareness and understanding of oak ecology to both provide answers to the public and affect management solutions through better techniques. It was clear that we, as resource professionals, were quite divided in our understandings of how these systems worked and what were and were not appropriate recommendations when lending technical assistance to the inquiring public. Once assembled at the conference and with the quality of presentations and subject matter, it was easy to see that we also needed to capture more of the expertise attending this event.","PeriodicalId":167617,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings The First Conference on Computers, Freedom & Privacy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Do We Go from Here?\",\"authors\":\"P. Bernstein, M. Culnan, L. Hoffman, D. Hughes, D. Ingraham, M. Kapor, E. Lieberman, P. Neumann, D. Parker, C. Schiffries, R. Veeder, J. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCFP.1991.664765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION – MARTIN L. BLANEY In the process of putting this symposium together with a diverse group of conservation partners, a momentum of purpose and resolve developed that seems to be unprecedented in our region. Upon witnessing our upland oak forests and woodlands slowly degrade in health and vigor through the last decades of our collective careers and then to watch their accelerated decline in the last three years has brought us to the same question. Can we continue in our own spheres of responsibilities and allow such a shift in forest communities to occur without our concerted efforts to find and affect solutions? With defiant conviction, the response was a collective “not on our watch.” A strategy formed around the oak sustainability issue that had its beginnings in the Forestry Subcommittee of the Arkansas Wildlife Federation with the formation of a coalition of partners. At the same time, acting as a catalyst, an issue of the Arkansas Wildlife magazine focusing on oak decline was printed and widely circulated. The many and widely favorable responses received from the widespread distribution of this publication, further heightened the resolve of the coalition to the possibility of changing public opinion regarding the need for human intervention into the oak communities. With the onset of the red oak borer outbreak, questions from the public regarding hardwood forest management began to accelerate and the obvious gaps and conflicts in our professional understandings was apparent. These events lead to the eventual need of assembling the various resource professions to gain a cohesive awareness and understanding of oak ecology to both provide answers to the public and affect management solutions through better techniques. It was clear that we, as resource professionals, were quite divided in our understandings of how these systems worked and what were and were not appropriate recommendations when lending technical assistance to the inquiring public. Once assembled at the conference and with the quality of presentations and subject matter, it was easy to see that we also needed to capture more of the expertise attending this event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings The First Conference on Computers, Freedom & Privacy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings The First Conference on Computers, Freedom & Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCFP.1991.664765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings The First Conference on Computers, Freedom & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCFP.1991.664765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在与不同群体的保护伙伴一起举办这次研讨会的过程中,一种目标和决心的势头在我们地区似乎是前所未有的。在我们共同事业的最后几十年里,目睹了我们的高地橡树林和林地在健康和活力方面慢慢退化,然后又目睹了它们在过去三年中加速退化,这使我们想到了同样的问题。我们能否继续在自己的责任范围内工作,允许森林社区发生这种转变,而不作出一致努力寻找和影响解决办法?带着挑衅的信念,回应是集体的“不在我们的监督之下”。围绕橡树可持续性问题形成的战略始于阿肯色州野生动物联合会的林业小组委员会,并形成了一个合作伙伴联盟。与此同时,《阿肯色州野生动物》杂志出版了一期关注橡树衰退的杂志,起到了催化剂的作用。该出版物的广泛分发收到了许多广泛好评的回应,进一步增强了联盟的决心,即有可能改变公众对人类干预橡树社区的需要的看法。随着红橡树蛀虫疫情的爆发,公众对阔叶林管理的质疑开始加速,我们在专业认识上的明显差距和冲突也开始显现。这些事件导致最终需要聚集各种资源专业人员,以获得对橡树生态的一致认识和理解,从而为公众提供答案,并通过更好的技术影响管理解决方案。很明显,作为资源专业人员,我们对这些系统如何工作以及在向询问的公众提供技术援助时什么是适当的建议,什么是不适当的建议的理解存在很大分歧。一旦聚集在会议上,随着演讲和主题的质量,很容易看出,我们还需要吸引更多的专业知识参加这次活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where Do We Go from Here?
INTRODUCTION – MARTIN L. BLANEY In the process of putting this symposium together with a diverse group of conservation partners, a momentum of purpose and resolve developed that seems to be unprecedented in our region. Upon witnessing our upland oak forests and woodlands slowly degrade in health and vigor through the last decades of our collective careers and then to watch their accelerated decline in the last three years has brought us to the same question. Can we continue in our own spheres of responsibilities and allow such a shift in forest communities to occur without our concerted efforts to find and affect solutions? With defiant conviction, the response was a collective “not on our watch.” A strategy formed around the oak sustainability issue that had its beginnings in the Forestry Subcommittee of the Arkansas Wildlife Federation with the formation of a coalition of partners. At the same time, acting as a catalyst, an issue of the Arkansas Wildlife magazine focusing on oak decline was printed and widely circulated. The many and widely favorable responses received from the widespread distribution of this publication, further heightened the resolve of the coalition to the possibility of changing public opinion regarding the need for human intervention into the oak communities. With the onset of the red oak borer outbreak, questions from the public regarding hardwood forest management began to accelerate and the obvious gaps and conflicts in our professional understandings was apparent. These events lead to the eventual need of assembling the various resource professions to gain a cohesive awareness and understanding of oak ecology to both provide answers to the public and affect management solutions through better techniques. It was clear that we, as resource professionals, were quite divided in our understandings of how these systems worked and what were and were not appropriate recommendations when lending technical assistance to the inquiring public. Once assembled at the conference and with the quality of presentations and subject matter, it was easy to see that we also needed to capture more of the expertise attending this event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信