市场与隐私

K. Laudon
{"title":"市场与隐私","authors":"K. Laudon","doi":"10.1145/234215.234476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1960s privacy advocates have relied on regulatory and legislativeapproaches to privacy protection in the United States, Canada and Europe. Whileimportant progress has been made in certain areas, there are large gaps andsignificant loopholes in existing legislation. I argue that a market-based approachto privacy protection would be far more effective and efficient in protectingindividual information than current approaches.","PeriodicalId":376400,"journal":{"name":"NYU: IOMS: Information Systems Working Papers (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"337","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Markets and privacy\",\"authors\":\"K. Laudon\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/234215.234476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 1960s privacy advocates have relied on regulatory and legislativeapproaches to privacy protection in the United States, Canada and Europe. Whileimportant progress has been made in certain areas, there are large gaps andsignificant loopholes in existing legislation. I argue that a market-based approachto privacy protection would be far more effective and efficient in protectingindividual information than current approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NYU: IOMS: Information Systems Working Papers (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"337\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NYU: IOMS: Information Systems Working Papers (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/234215.234476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NYU: IOMS: Information Systems Working Papers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/234215.234476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 337

摘要

自20世纪60年代以来,在美国、加拿大和欧洲,隐私倡导者一直依靠监管和立法手段来保护隐私。虽然在某些领域取得了重要进展,但现有立法存在很大差距和重大漏洞。我认为,以市场为基础的隐私保护方法在保护个人信息方面要比目前的方法有效得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Markets and privacy
Since the 1960s privacy advocates have relied on regulatory and legislativeapproaches to privacy protection in the United States, Canada and Europe. Whileimportant progress has been made in certain areas, there are large gaps andsignificant loopholes in existing legislation. I argue that a market-based approachto privacy protection would be far more effective and efficient in protectingindividual information than current approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信