印刷莱布尼茨的微积分:《新方法》的年代和版本编号(1684年10月)

Sam Lemley
{"title":"印刷莱布尼茨的微积分:《新方法》的年代和版本编号(1684年10月)","authors":"Sam Lemley","doi":"10.1093/LIBRARY/22.2.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The textual history of the first work on infinitesimal calculus and differentiation in print—Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s ‘Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis …’ in the October 1684 instalment of the Leipzig scientific journal Acta Eruditorum—remains unstudied. Consequent to this inattention, extant copies of Leibniz’s article have been assigned to a single edition and a single press, despite evidence of substantive variation among them. This article examines the typographic and bibliographical evidence across multiple copies of the October 1684 instalment of the Acta to demonstrate that these extant copies in fact represent three separate editions printed on multiple presses over many years. This evidence, in turn, casts new light on both the complex printing history of the Acta Eruditorum in its first decade of publication (1682–93) and the distribution of learned periodicals in the seventeenth century.","PeriodicalId":188492,"journal":{"name":"The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Printing Leibniz’s Calculus: Dating and Numbering the Editions of the Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis (October 1684)\",\"authors\":\"Sam Lemley\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/LIBRARY/22.2.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The textual history of the first work on infinitesimal calculus and differentiation in print—Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s ‘Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis …’ in the October 1684 instalment of the Leipzig scientific journal Acta Eruditorum—remains unstudied. Consequent to this inattention, extant copies of Leibniz’s article have been assigned to a single edition and a single press, despite evidence of substantive variation among them. This article examines the typographic and bibliographical evidence across multiple copies of the October 1684 instalment of the Acta to demonstrate that these extant copies in fact represent three separate editions printed on multiple presses over many years. This evidence, in turn, casts new light on both the complex printing history of the Acta Eruditorum in its first decade of publication (1682–93) and the distribution of learned periodicals in the seventeenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/LIBRARY/22.2.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LIBRARY/22.2.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

第一部关于无穷小量微积分和微分的著作——戈特弗里德·威廉·莱布尼茨在1684年10月出版的莱比锡科学期刊《学术学报》上发表的《新星方法》——的文本历史仍未得到研究。由于这种疏忽,莱布尼茨文章的现存副本被分配到一个版本和一个出版社,尽管有证据表明它们之间存在实质性差异。本文考察了1684年10月出版的《学报》的多个副本的排版和书目证据,以证明这些现存的副本实际上代表了三个独立的版本,在多个出版社上印刷了很多年。这一证据反过来又为《博学学报》出版的第一个十年(1682-93)复杂的印刷历史和17世纪学术期刊的分布提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Printing Leibniz’s Calculus: Dating and Numbering the Editions of the Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis (October 1684)
The textual history of the first work on infinitesimal calculus and differentiation in print—Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s ‘Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis …’ in the October 1684 instalment of the Leipzig scientific journal Acta Eruditorum—remains unstudied. Consequent to this inattention, extant copies of Leibniz’s article have been assigned to a single edition and a single press, despite evidence of substantive variation among them. This article examines the typographic and bibliographical evidence across multiple copies of the October 1684 instalment of the Acta to demonstrate that these extant copies in fact represent three separate editions printed on multiple presses over many years. This evidence, in turn, casts new light on both the complex printing history of the Acta Eruditorum in its first decade of publication (1682–93) and the distribution of learned periodicals in the seventeenth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信