{"title":"远程呈现机器人的手和目光控制","authors":"Guangtao Zhang, J. P. Hansen, Katsumi Minakata","doi":"10.1145/3317956.3318149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile robotic telepresence systems are increasingly used to promote social interaction between geographically dispersed people. People with severe motor disabilities may use eye-gaze to control a telepresence robots. However, use of gaze control for navigation of robots needs to be explored. This paper presents an experimental comparison between gaze-controlled and hand-controlled telepresence robots with a head-mounted display. Participants (n = 16) had similar experience of presence and self-assessment, but gaze control was 31% slower than hand control. Gaze-controlled robots had more collisions and higher deviations from optimal paths. Moreover, with gaze control, participants reported a higher workload, a reduced feeling of dominance, and their situation awareness was significantly degraded. The accuracy of their post-trial reproduction of the maze layout and the trial duration were also significantly lower.","PeriodicalId":161901,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand- and gaze-control of telepresence robots\",\"authors\":\"Guangtao Zhang, J. P. Hansen, Katsumi Minakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3317956.3318149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile robotic telepresence systems are increasingly used to promote social interaction between geographically dispersed people. People with severe motor disabilities may use eye-gaze to control a telepresence robots. However, use of gaze control for navigation of robots needs to be explored. This paper presents an experimental comparison between gaze-controlled and hand-controlled telepresence robots with a head-mounted display. Participants (n = 16) had similar experience of presence and self-assessment, but gaze control was 31% slower than hand control. Gaze-controlled robots had more collisions and higher deviations from optimal paths. Moreover, with gaze control, participants reported a higher workload, a reduced feeling of dominance, and their situation awareness was significantly degraded. The accuracy of their post-trial reproduction of the maze layout and the trial duration were also significantly lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3317956.3318149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3317956.3318149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mobile robotic telepresence systems are increasingly used to promote social interaction between geographically dispersed people. People with severe motor disabilities may use eye-gaze to control a telepresence robots. However, use of gaze control for navigation of robots needs to be explored. This paper presents an experimental comparison between gaze-controlled and hand-controlled telepresence robots with a head-mounted display. Participants (n = 16) had similar experience of presence and self-assessment, but gaze control was 31% slower than hand control. Gaze-controlled robots had more collisions and higher deviations from optimal paths. Moreover, with gaze control, participants reported a higher workload, a reduced feeling of dominance, and their situation awareness was significantly degraded. The accuracy of their post-trial reproduction of the maze layout and the trial duration were also significantly lower.