M. Kozak
{"title":"Czas jako sposób bycia istoty śmiertelnej — polemika Lévinasa z Heideggerem","authors":"M. Kozak","doi":"10.19195/1895-8001.16.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of my article is to juxtapose and compare the concept of man immersed in the finite (Heidegger) and on the other hand transcending towards the infinite (Levinas). My task is to extract and analyse the fabulously contrasting moments in the thought of Heidegger and Levinas on the question of the connec-tion and interpenetration of time and death. Both philosophers grow out of the phenomenological tradition, but their analyses of the problem of the connection between time and death go in different directions. The experiences of time and death are inextricably linked, but for Heidegger time is the ontological horizon of being, and for Levinas time is a way of being beyond being. For Heidegger, dying is about coming to the fullness of being. For Levinas, facing death is a struggle and even a war, a transcendence towards the infinite. While for Heidegger death is the completion of the end, for Levinas death means an encounter with radical otherness, it is an opening and not a closing.","PeriodicalId":262683,"journal":{"name":"Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/1895-8001.16.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我这篇文章的目的是将沉浸在有限(海德格尔)和超越无限(列维纳斯)的人的概念并列和比较。我的任务是提取和分析海德格尔和列维纳斯关于时间与死亡的联系和相互渗透问题的思想中令人难以置信的对比时刻。两位哲学家都是从现象学传统中成长起来的,但他们对时间与死亡之间联系问题的分析却走向了不同的方向。时间与死亡的体验有着千丝万缕的联系,但对于海德格尔来说,时间是存在的本体论视界,而对于列维纳斯来说,时间是一种超越存在的存在方式。对海德格尔来说,死亡就是走向存在的圆满。对列维纳斯来说,面对死亡是一场斗争,甚至是一场战争,是对无限的超越。对于海德格尔来说,死亡是结束的完成,而对于列维纳斯来说,死亡意味着与激进的他者的相遇,它是一个开始,而不是结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Czas jako sposób bycia istoty śmiertelnej — polemika Lévinasa z Heideggerem
The aim of my article is to juxtapose and compare the concept of man immersed in the finite (Heidegger) and on the other hand transcending towards the infinite (Levinas). My task is to extract and analyse the fabulously contrasting moments in the thought of Heidegger and Levinas on the question of the connec-tion and interpenetration of time and death. Both philosophers grow out of the phenomenological tradition, but their analyses of the problem of the connection between time and death go in different directions. The experiences of time and death are inextricably linked, but for Heidegger time is the ontological horizon of being, and for Levinas time is a way of being beyond being. For Heidegger, dying is about coming to the fullness of being. For Levinas, facing death is a struggle and even a war, a transcendence towards the infinite. While for Heidegger death is the completion of the end, for Levinas death means an encounter with radical otherness, it is an opening and not a closing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信