{"title":"死刑的警钟:减少死刑中种族歧视的风险","authors":"Maxine D. Goodman","doi":"10.15779/Z38SD0H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ernest Gaines's novel A Lesson Before Dying, Gaines tells the story of Jefferson, a young African-American man convicted of murdering a white grocery store owner in a small Louisiana town in the late 1940s. 1 The public defender, trying to arouse sympathy for the defendant, refers to Jefferson as a dumb animal-a \"hog.\" 2 The lawyer implores the jurors to \"look at the shape of this skull, this face as flat as the palm of my hand.\"3 Surely this \"thing,\" his argument continues, could not plan a murder.4 In Gaines's story, the all-white jury convicts Jefferson of murder, and the judge, seeing no reason Jefferson should not \"pay for the part he played in this horrible crime,\" sentences him to death by electrocution.5 The story's poignancy comes from the questions it provokes concerning whether we have progressed beyond the 1940s capital punishment system it describes. Today, presumably, neither side's counsel would refer to an African-American defendant as a \"hog.\" However, as demonstrated herein, racial discrimination continues to permeate death penalty decisions. In Green v. Texas, of the four people responsible for a murder, the petitioner, an African-American, was the only one charged with capital murder. Two African-American accomplices plea-bargained for prison sentences on aggravated robbery charges, and the fourth accomplice, a Caucasian, was not","PeriodicalId":386851,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Death Penalty Wake-up Call: Reducing the Risk of Racial Discrimination in Capital Punishment\",\"authors\":\"Maxine D. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38SD0H\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Ernest Gaines's novel A Lesson Before Dying, Gaines tells the story of Jefferson, a young African-American man convicted of murdering a white grocery store owner in a small Louisiana town in the late 1940s. 1 The public defender, trying to arouse sympathy for the defendant, refers to Jefferson as a dumb animal-a \\\"hog.\\\" 2 The lawyer implores the jurors to \\\"look at the shape of this skull, this face as flat as the palm of my hand.\\\"3 Surely this \\\"thing,\\\" his argument continues, could not plan a murder.4 In Gaines's story, the all-white jury convicts Jefferson of murder, and the judge, seeing no reason Jefferson should not \\\"pay for the part he played in this horrible crime,\\\" sentences him to death by electrocution.5 The story's poignancy comes from the questions it provokes concerning whether we have progressed beyond the 1940s capital punishment system it describes. Today, presumably, neither side's counsel would refer to an African-American defendant as a \\\"hog.\\\" However, as demonstrated herein, racial discrimination continues to permeate death penalty decisions. In Green v. Texas, of the four people responsible for a murder, the petitioner, an African-American, was the only one charged with capital murder. Two African-American accomplices plea-bargained for prison sentences on aggravated robbery charges, and the fourth accomplice, a Caucasian, was not\",\"PeriodicalId\":386851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SD0H\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38SD0H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
在欧内斯特·盖恩斯(Ernest Gaines)的小说《死前的一课》(A Lesson Before Dying)中,盖恩斯讲述了20世纪40年代末,一个年轻的非裔美国人杰斐逊(Jefferson)在路易斯安那州的一个小镇上谋杀了一位白人杂货店老板的故事。公设辩护人试图引起人们对被告的同情,把杰斐逊称为一个哑巴动物——一头“猪”。律师恳求陪审员“看看这个头骨的形状,这张脸就像我的手掌一样平坦。”他继续说,这个“东西”肯定不会策划谋杀在盖恩斯的故事中,全是白人的陪审团判定杰斐逊犯有谋杀罪,法官认为杰斐逊没有理由不“为他在这一可怕罪行中所扮演的角色付出代价”,于是判处他电刑这个故事的辛酸来自于它引发的问题:我们是否已经超越了它所描述的20世纪40年代的死刑制度。今天,想必双方的律师都不会把非裔美国被告称为“猪”。然而,如本文所示,种族歧视继续渗透到死刑判决中。在格林诉德克萨斯州案(Green v. Texas)中,在一起谋杀案的四个人中,非裔美国人申诉人是唯一被控谋杀罪的人。两名非裔共犯就加重抢劫指控的刑期进行了辩诉交易,而第四名共犯,一名白人,则没有被判入狱
A Death Penalty Wake-up Call: Reducing the Risk of Racial Discrimination in Capital Punishment
In Ernest Gaines's novel A Lesson Before Dying, Gaines tells the story of Jefferson, a young African-American man convicted of murdering a white grocery store owner in a small Louisiana town in the late 1940s. 1 The public defender, trying to arouse sympathy for the defendant, refers to Jefferson as a dumb animal-a "hog." 2 The lawyer implores the jurors to "look at the shape of this skull, this face as flat as the palm of my hand."3 Surely this "thing," his argument continues, could not plan a murder.4 In Gaines's story, the all-white jury convicts Jefferson of murder, and the judge, seeing no reason Jefferson should not "pay for the part he played in this horrible crime," sentences him to death by electrocution.5 The story's poignancy comes from the questions it provokes concerning whether we have progressed beyond the 1940s capital punishment system it describes. Today, presumably, neither side's counsel would refer to an African-American defendant as a "hog." However, as demonstrated herein, racial discrimination continues to permeate death penalty decisions. In Green v. Texas, of the four people responsible for a murder, the petitioner, an African-American, was the only one charged with capital murder. Two African-American accomplices plea-bargained for prison sentences on aggravated robbery charges, and the fourth accomplice, a Caucasian, was not