{"title":"al-Shāfi与al- tahawi关于矛盾中偏好的方法论比较分析Ḥadīth","authors":"Dr.Muhammad Waris Ali","doi":"10.46568/ihya.v21i2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Al-Shāfiʿī(d204/820) and al-Ṭaḥāwī(d321/933) have contributed in resolving Contradiction of Ḥadīth. Al-Shāfiʿī has compiled Ikhtilāf-al-Ḥadīth and al-Ṭaḥāwī has written Sharaḥ M’āni al-Athār in this particular field. Al-Shāfiʿī is the founder of Shāfiʿī Fiqh and al-Ṭaḥāwī is the representative of Ḥanfi school of thought. This study focusses the methodologies of both the scholars with examples taken from their books.They have solved many issues by giving preference to one Ḥadīth on the other. They differed on some issues with each other as al-Shāfiʿī has given preference to the Ḥadīth reported by ibn-us-Ṣimmah over Ḥadīth of Ammar ibn Yasir but al-Ṭaḥāwī resolved the contradiction with abrogation.","PeriodicalId":101854,"journal":{"name":"Iḥyāʾalʿulūm - Journal of Department of Quran o Sunnah","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of al-Shāfiʿī and al-Tahawī’s Methodologies Regarding Preference in Contradictory Ḥadīth\",\"authors\":\"Dr.Muhammad Waris Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.46568/ihya.v21i2.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Al-Shāfiʿī(d204/820) and al-Ṭaḥāwī(d321/933) have contributed in resolving Contradiction of Ḥadīth. Al-Shāfiʿī has compiled Ikhtilāf-al-Ḥadīth and al-Ṭaḥāwī has written Sharaḥ M’āni al-Athār in this particular field. Al-Shāfiʿī is the founder of Shāfiʿī Fiqh and al-Ṭaḥāwī is the representative of Ḥanfi school of thought. This study focusses the methodologies of both the scholars with examples taken from their books.They have solved many issues by giving preference to one Ḥadīth on the other. They differed on some issues with each other as al-Shāfiʿī has given preference to the Ḥadīth reported by ibn-us-Ṣimmah over Ḥadīth of Ammar ibn Yasir but al-Ṭaḥāwī resolved the contradiction with abrogation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iḥyāʾalʿulūm - Journal of Department of Quran o Sunnah\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iḥyāʾalʿulūm - Journal of Department of Quran o Sunnah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46568/ihya.v21i2.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iḥyāʾalʿulūm - Journal of Department of Quran o Sunnah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46568/ihya.v21i2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Al-Shāfi (d204/820)和al (-Ṭaḥāwī(d321/933)对解决Ḥadīth的矛盾做出了贡献。Al-Shāfi“al- -Ṭaḥāwī”编辑了Ikhtilāf-al-Ḥadīth,而al- -Ṭaḥāwī则编写了这一特定领域的sharajah M ' āni al-Athār。Al-Shāfi是Shāfi的创始人,-Ṭaḥāwī是Ḥanfi学派的代表人物。本研究的重点是两位学者的方法,并从他们的书中取了例子。他们通过优先考虑一个Ḥadīth而解决了许多问题。他们在一些问题上彼此存在分歧,因为al-Shāfi“伊”更倾向于伊本-乌斯-Ṣimmah报道的Ḥadīth而不是阿马尔·伊本·亚西尔的Ḥadīth,但-Ṭaḥāwī以废除的方式解决了这一矛盾。
Comparative Analysis of al-Shāfiʿī and al-Tahawī’s Methodologies Regarding Preference in Contradictory Ḥadīth
Al-Shāfiʿī(d204/820) and al-Ṭaḥāwī(d321/933) have contributed in resolving Contradiction of Ḥadīth. Al-Shāfiʿī has compiled Ikhtilāf-al-Ḥadīth and al-Ṭaḥāwī has written Sharaḥ M’āni al-Athār in this particular field. Al-Shāfiʿī is the founder of Shāfiʿī Fiqh and al-Ṭaḥāwī is the representative of Ḥanfi school of thought. This study focusses the methodologies of both the scholars with examples taken from their books.They have solved many issues by giving preference to one Ḥadīth on the other. They differed on some issues with each other as al-Shāfiʿī has given preference to the Ḥadīth reported by ibn-us-Ṣimmah over Ḥadīth of Ammar ibn Yasir but al-Ṭaḥāwī resolved the contradiction with abrogation.