二十世纪印尼苏菲派的争议与论战

M. Bruinessen
{"title":"二十世纪印尼苏菲派的争议与论战","authors":"M. Bruinessen","doi":"10.1163/9789004452725_039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The controversies and polemics that will be discussed in this chapter \nall took place in the context of the larger ongoing process of Islamic \nreform, the struggle against local custom and other alleged bid`a in \nbelief and practice. This does not mean, however, that Sufis and \nreformists at any one time constituted two opposed blocks. In many \nof the cases under review, we shall find Sufi shaykhs pitted not \nagainst anti-Sufi reformists but against other Sufis; some of the \nfiercest debates, as we shall see below, in fact were internal to one of \nthe orders, the Naqshbandiyya.","PeriodicalId":330518,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Mysticism Contested","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies and Polemics Involving the Sufi Orders in Twentieth-Century Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"M. Bruinessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004452725_039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The controversies and polemics that will be discussed in this chapter \\nall took place in the context of the larger ongoing process of Islamic \\nreform, the struggle against local custom and other alleged bid`a in \\nbelief and practice. This does not mean, however, that Sufis and \\nreformists at any one time constituted two opposed blocks. In many \\nof the cases under review, we shall find Sufi shaykhs pitted not \\nagainst anti-Sufi reformists but against other Sufis; some of the \\nfiercest debates, as we shall see below, in fact were internal to one of \\nthe orders, the Naqshbandiyya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamic Mysticism Contested\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamic Mysticism Contested\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452725_039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Mysticism Contested","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452725_039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本章将要讨论的争议和论战都发生在更大的伊斯兰改革进程的背景下,与当地习俗和其他所谓的信仰和实践的斗争。然而,这并不意味着苏菲派和改革派在任何时候都构成两个对立的阵营。在我们回顾的许多案例中,我们会发现苏菲派谢赫不是与反苏菲派改革派对立,而是与其他苏菲派对立;一些最激烈的争论,正如我们将在下面看到的,实际上发生在其中一个教团内部,Naqshbandiyya。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies and Polemics Involving the Sufi Orders in Twentieth-Century Indonesia
The controversies and polemics that will be discussed in this chapter all took place in the context of the larger ongoing process of Islamic reform, the struggle against local custom and other alleged bid`a in belief and practice. This does not mean, however, that Sufis and reformists at any one time constituted two opposed blocks. In many of the cases under review, we shall find Sufi shaykhs pitted not against anti-Sufi reformists but against other Sufis; some of the fiercest debates, as we shall see below, in fact were internal to one of the orders, the Naqshbandiyya.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信