{"title":"二十世纪印尼苏菲派的争议与论战","authors":"M. Bruinessen","doi":"10.1163/9789004452725_039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The controversies and polemics that will be discussed in this chapter \nall took place in the context of the larger ongoing process of Islamic \nreform, the struggle against local custom and other alleged bid`a in \nbelief and practice. This does not mean, however, that Sufis and \nreformists at any one time constituted two opposed blocks. In many \nof the cases under review, we shall find Sufi shaykhs pitted not \nagainst anti-Sufi reformists but against other Sufis; some of the \nfiercest debates, as we shall see below, in fact were internal to one of \nthe orders, the Naqshbandiyya.","PeriodicalId":330518,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Mysticism Contested","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies and Polemics Involving the Sufi Orders in Twentieth-Century Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"M. Bruinessen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004452725_039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The controversies and polemics that will be discussed in this chapter \\nall took place in the context of the larger ongoing process of Islamic \\nreform, the struggle against local custom and other alleged bid`a in \\nbelief and practice. This does not mean, however, that Sufis and \\nreformists at any one time constituted two opposed blocks. In many \\nof the cases under review, we shall find Sufi shaykhs pitted not \\nagainst anti-Sufi reformists but against other Sufis; some of the \\nfiercest debates, as we shall see below, in fact were internal to one of \\nthe orders, the Naqshbandiyya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamic Mysticism Contested\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamic Mysticism Contested\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452725_039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Mysticism Contested","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452725_039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Controversies and Polemics Involving the Sufi Orders in Twentieth-Century Indonesia
The controversies and polemics that will be discussed in this chapter
all took place in the context of the larger ongoing process of Islamic
reform, the struggle against local custom and other alleged bid`a in
belief and practice. This does not mean, however, that Sufis and
reformists at any one time constituted two opposed blocks. In many
of the cases under review, we shall find Sufi shaykhs pitted not
against anti-Sufi reformists but against other Sufis; some of the
fiercest debates, as we shall see below, in fact were internal to one of
the orders, the Naqshbandiyya.