论混合政权的起源与巩固高加索地区的民主状况

Jonathan Wheatley, C. Zürcher
{"title":"论混合政权的起源与巩固高加索地区的民主状况","authors":"Jonathan Wheatley, C. Zürcher","doi":"10.5167/UZH-98570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regimes in Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, while broadly conforming to the category of ”hybrid regimes,” should not be treated as a half-way stage in a process of transition to democracy, but rather as stable, based on the institutional structures of clientelism. The authors identify the origin of these regimes and show how their emergence is, to a large extent, the consequence of the strategies that the new rulers chose in order to secure their authority in the years following independence. Even in Georgia, the recent ”colored revolution” had little impact on the institutional parameters of the hybrid regime. The quintessential features that underpin the hybrid regimes of the Caucasus are the clientelism that constitutes the informal dynamic of these regimes and the ”stickiness” of the informal institutions that define state power. Given the specific internal and external constraints in which these regimes are embedded, the degree of democracy that they have reached may be at an equilibrium outcome.","PeriodicalId":403398,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan journal of democracy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Origin and Consolidation of Hybrid Regimes the State of Democracy in the Caucasus\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Wheatley, C. Zürcher\",\"doi\":\"10.5167/UZH-98570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The regimes in Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, while broadly conforming to the category of ”hybrid regimes,” should not be treated as a half-way stage in a process of transition to democracy, but rather as stable, based on the institutional structures of clientelism. The authors identify the origin of these regimes and show how their emergence is, to a large extent, the consequence of the strategies that the new rulers chose in order to secure their authority in the years following independence. Even in Georgia, the recent ”colored revolution” had little impact on the institutional parameters of the hybrid regime. The quintessential features that underpin the hybrid regimes of the Caucasus are the clientelism that constitutes the informal dynamic of these regimes and the ”stickiness” of the informal institutions that define state power. Given the specific internal and external constraints in which these regimes are embedded, the degree of democracy that they have reached may be at an equilibrium outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan journal of democracy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan journal of democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-98570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan journal of democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-98570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

格鲁吉亚、亚美尼亚和阿塞拜疆的政权虽然大体符合“混合型政权”的范畴,但不应被视为向民主过渡过程中的中间阶段,而应被视为建立在裙带主义制度结构基础上的稳定政权。作者确定了这些政权的起源,并表明它们的出现在很大程度上是新统治者在独立后的几年中为确保其权威而选择的策略的结果。即使在格鲁吉亚,最近的“颜色革命”对混合政权的制度参数影响甚微。支撑高加索地区混合政权的最典型特征是构成这些政权非正式动态的庇护主义,以及定义国家权力的非正式机构的“粘性”。鉴于这些政权所受到的具体的内部和外部限制,它们所达到的民主程度可能处于一个平衡的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Origin and Consolidation of Hybrid Regimes the State of Democracy in the Caucasus
The regimes in Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, while broadly conforming to the category of ”hybrid regimes,” should not be treated as a half-way stage in a process of transition to democracy, but rather as stable, based on the institutional structures of clientelism. The authors identify the origin of these regimes and show how their emergence is, to a large extent, the consequence of the strategies that the new rulers chose in order to secure their authority in the years following independence. Even in Georgia, the recent ”colored revolution” had little impact on the institutional parameters of the hybrid regime. The quintessential features that underpin the hybrid regimes of the Caucasus are the clientelism that constitutes the informal dynamic of these regimes and the ”stickiness” of the informal institutions that define state power. Given the specific internal and external constraints in which these regimes are embedded, the degree of democracy that they have reached may be at an equilibrium outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信