网络论坛对学生批判性思维和写作能力的影响

F. Fatimah, Yenni Rozimela, Hermawati Syarif
{"title":"网络论坛对学生批判性思维和写作能力的影响","authors":"F. Fatimah, Yenni Rozimela, Hermawati Syarif","doi":"10.2991/ICLA-18.2019.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The utilization of gadgets can influence student’s participation on teaching and learning process. To that aim, online discussion forum is often used allowing students to engage in critical contestation of ideas. Theoritically, criticism is the process of responding to and evaluating ideas, argument, and style of others. In light of learning process especially in the tertiary level, Dasbender (2011:38) asserts that students often come across critical thinking and analysis as requirements for assignments in writing and upper-level courses. In this study, graduate students’ comments on their discussion are analyzed. The analysis stems from the fact that such comments imply students’ ability to think critically on the aspects of inference, deduction, recognition of assumption, interpretation, and evaluation of arguments. The comments show how well students can argumentatively write their ideas based on the aspects of clarity, logicality, flexibility and relevancy. The data are collected from online discussion forum of Advanced Sociolinguistics subject in UNP. From the analysis, it is known that students have been able to give their interpretation related to the topic being discussed. The students still need to enhance their reading in order to be able to share ideas in case of deduction and inference because these two terms require students deep understanding on certain topic based on credible theories. Besides, student’s comments have reflected four indicators of argumentative writing overal.","PeriodicalId":249218,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ Critical Thinking And Writing Ability Reflected On Online Discussion Forum\",\"authors\":\"F. Fatimah, Yenni Rozimela, Hermawati Syarif\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICLA-18.2019.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The utilization of gadgets can influence student’s participation on teaching and learning process. To that aim, online discussion forum is often used allowing students to engage in critical contestation of ideas. Theoritically, criticism is the process of responding to and evaluating ideas, argument, and style of others. In light of learning process especially in the tertiary level, Dasbender (2011:38) asserts that students often come across critical thinking and analysis as requirements for assignments in writing and upper-level courses. In this study, graduate students’ comments on their discussion are analyzed. The analysis stems from the fact that such comments imply students’ ability to think critically on the aspects of inference, deduction, recognition of assumption, interpretation, and evaluation of arguments. The comments show how well students can argumentatively write their ideas based on the aspects of clarity, logicality, flexibility and relevancy. The data are collected from online discussion forum of Advanced Sociolinguistics subject in UNP. From the analysis, it is known that students have been able to give their interpretation related to the topic being discussed. The students still need to enhance their reading in order to be able to share ideas in case of deduction and inference because these two terms require students deep understanding on certain topic based on credible theories. Besides, student’s comments have reflected four indicators of argumentative writing overal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICLA-18.2019.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICLA-18.2019.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子设备的使用会影响学生对教学和学习过程的参与。为此,经常使用在线讨论论坛,让学生参与批判性的思想辩论。从理论上讲,批评是对他人的观点、论点和风格做出回应和评价的过程。在学习过程中,尤其是在高等教育阶段,Dasbender(2011:38)断言,学生在写作和高级课程的作业中经常遇到批判性思维和分析的要求。在本研究中,分析了研究生对他们的讨论的评论。这种分析源于这样一个事实,即这样的评论暗示了学生在推理、演绎、识别假设、解释和评价论点方面批判性思考的能力。评语显示了学生在清晰性、逻辑性、灵活性和相关性方面的议论文写作能力。数据来源于联合国大学高级社会语言学在线论坛。从分析中可以看出,学生们已经能够就所讨论的话题给出自己的解释。在演绎和推理的情况下,学生仍然需要提高他们的阅读能力,以便能够分享想法,因为这两个术语需要学生在可信的理论基础上对某个主题有深刻的理解。此外,学生的评论总体上反映了议论文写作的四个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students’ Critical Thinking And Writing Ability Reflected On Online Discussion Forum
The utilization of gadgets can influence student’s participation on teaching and learning process. To that aim, online discussion forum is often used allowing students to engage in critical contestation of ideas. Theoritically, criticism is the process of responding to and evaluating ideas, argument, and style of others. In light of learning process especially in the tertiary level, Dasbender (2011:38) asserts that students often come across critical thinking and analysis as requirements for assignments in writing and upper-level courses. In this study, graduate students’ comments on their discussion are analyzed. The analysis stems from the fact that such comments imply students’ ability to think critically on the aspects of inference, deduction, recognition of assumption, interpretation, and evaluation of arguments. The comments show how well students can argumentatively write their ideas based on the aspects of clarity, logicality, flexibility and relevancy. The data are collected from online discussion forum of Advanced Sociolinguistics subject in UNP. From the analysis, it is known that students have been able to give their interpretation related to the topic being discussed. The students still need to enhance their reading in order to be able to share ideas in case of deduction and inference because these two terms require students deep understanding on certain topic based on credible theories. Besides, student’s comments have reflected four indicators of argumentative writing overal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信