寻找社会主义主体:激进政治经济学与第三世界的道德激励研究

Benjamin Feldman
{"title":"寻找社会主义主体:激进政治经济学与第三世界的道德激励研究","authors":"Benjamin Feldman","doi":"10.1108/S0743-41542019000037A006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nFor Leftists engaged in the study of political economy during the 1960s and 1970s, Cuba and China held particular promise as postrevolutionary states working to construct systems of production and distribution which were predicated on solidarity and mutuality, rather than on the exploited and alienated labor upon which capitalism depended. Against the claim that the desire for individual material gain was irreducibly a part of the human experience, China and Cuba offered the possibility of – in the parlance of the time – a “new man”: a political subject whose motivations were in alignment with a socialist economy rather than a capitalist one. \n \nBased on research in multiple archives, this paper explores efforts on the part of radical economists in the United States – including the Marxists at Monthly Review, the young academics who founded the Union for Radical Political Economics (URPE), and a handful of older Left-Keynesians – to witness Third World experiments in nonmaterial incentives firsthand. What have often been dismissed as pseudo-religious “pilgrimages” were, in reality, voyages of discovery, where radicals searched for the keys to develop a sustainable, rational, and moral political economy. \n \nWhile many of the answers that radicals found in Cuba and China were ultimately unsatisfying, Third-World experiments in moral incentives serve as a powerful example of “solidarity in circulation” during the “long 1960s,” and as an important reminder that attempts to keep social science research free of political contamination serve to reify disciplinary norms which are themselves the product of the political culture in which they were formed.","PeriodicalId":257257,"journal":{"name":"Including A Symposium on 50 Years of the Union for Radical Political Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of the Socialist Subject: Radical Political Economy and the Study of Moral Incentives in the Third World\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S0743-41542019000037A006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nFor Leftists engaged in the study of political economy during the 1960s and 1970s, Cuba and China held particular promise as postrevolutionary states working to construct systems of production and distribution which were predicated on solidarity and mutuality, rather than on the exploited and alienated labor upon which capitalism depended. Against the claim that the desire for individual material gain was irreducibly a part of the human experience, China and Cuba offered the possibility of – in the parlance of the time – a “new man”: a political subject whose motivations were in alignment with a socialist economy rather than a capitalist one. \\n \\nBased on research in multiple archives, this paper explores efforts on the part of radical economists in the United States – including the Marxists at Monthly Review, the young academics who founded the Union for Radical Political Economics (URPE), and a handful of older Left-Keynesians – to witness Third World experiments in nonmaterial incentives firsthand. What have often been dismissed as pseudo-religious “pilgrimages” were, in reality, voyages of discovery, where radicals searched for the keys to develop a sustainable, rational, and moral political economy. \\n \\nWhile many of the answers that radicals found in Cuba and China were ultimately unsatisfying, Third-World experiments in moral incentives serve as a powerful example of “solidarity in circulation” during the “long 1960s,” and as an important reminder that attempts to keep social science research free of political contamination serve to reify disciplinary norms which are themselves the product of the political culture in which they were formed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Including A Symposium on 50 Years of the Union for Radical Political Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Including A Symposium on 50 Years of the Union for Radical Political Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542019000037A006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Including A Symposium on 50 Years of the Union for Radical Political Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542019000037A006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于20世纪60年代和70年代从事政治经济学研究的左翼人士来说,古巴和中国作为致力于建立以团结和相互关系为基础的生产和分配系统的后革命国家,而不是资本主义所依赖的被剥削和异化的劳动力,具有特殊的希望。与对个人物质利益的渴望是人类经验不可分割的一部分的说法相反,中国和古巴提供了一种可能性——用当时的说法——一个“新人”:一个政治主体,其动机与社会主义经济而不是资本主义经济相一致。基于对多个档案的研究,本文探讨了美国激进经济学家的努力——包括《每月评论》的马克思主义者,创立激进政治经济学联盟(URPE)的年轻学者,以及少数年长的左翼凯恩斯主义者——他们亲眼目睹了第三世界在非物质激励方面的实验。通常被视为伪宗教“朝圣”的活动,实际上是一次发现之旅,激进分子在此寻找发展可持续、理性和道德的政治经济的关键。虽然激进分子在古巴和中国找到的许多答案最终都不令人满意,但在“漫长的60年代”,第三世界在道德激励方面的实验是“流通中的团结”的有力例子,也是一个重要的提醒,即保持社会科学研究不受政治污染的努力有助于使学科规范具体化,而这些规范本身就是形成它们的政治文化的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Search of the Socialist Subject: Radical Political Economy and the Study of Moral Incentives in the Third World
Abstract For Leftists engaged in the study of political economy during the 1960s and 1970s, Cuba and China held particular promise as postrevolutionary states working to construct systems of production and distribution which were predicated on solidarity and mutuality, rather than on the exploited and alienated labor upon which capitalism depended. Against the claim that the desire for individual material gain was irreducibly a part of the human experience, China and Cuba offered the possibility of – in the parlance of the time – a “new man”: a political subject whose motivations were in alignment with a socialist economy rather than a capitalist one. Based on research in multiple archives, this paper explores efforts on the part of radical economists in the United States – including the Marxists at Monthly Review, the young academics who founded the Union for Radical Political Economics (URPE), and a handful of older Left-Keynesians – to witness Third World experiments in nonmaterial incentives firsthand. What have often been dismissed as pseudo-religious “pilgrimages” were, in reality, voyages of discovery, where radicals searched for the keys to develop a sustainable, rational, and moral political economy. While many of the answers that radicals found in Cuba and China were ultimately unsatisfying, Third-World experiments in moral incentives serve as a powerful example of “solidarity in circulation” during the “long 1960s,” and as an important reminder that attempts to keep social science research free of political contamination serve to reify disciplinary norms which are themselves the product of the political culture in which they were formed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信